IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] The last two reviews... issues for one of them are now filed in github

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Wed, 10 May 2023 16:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32935C1BE886 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2023 09:50:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.095
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.095 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=trammell.ch
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ahwl9nqM_5tQ for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 May 2023 09:50:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-190d.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-190d.mail.infomaniak.ch [IPv6:2001:1600:3:17::190d]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274CEC1BE891 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 May 2023 09:49:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (unknown [10.4.36.108]) by smtp-2-3000.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4QGgx5416dzMqFl1; Wed, 10 May 2023 18:49:45 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from unknown by smtp-3-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 4QGgx472DVzMppDc; Wed, 10 May 2023 18:49:44 +0200 (CEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=trammell.ch; s=20191114; t=1683737385; bh=E76ZgPJZl9QeIZmwLReaA00onGQv2wpV4UmvSAx04F8=; h=From:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:Cc:To:References:From; b=l7aush+9jSe3i2EUICrnbjJW9pUupE7y5+e6DJLfkBHjVocwhu6bOj/G9AtNnjGPC TIjaYzAPT7u16vHsmTabUB5W/hGdjJ+m1T863fAyTSuftEUpwpi1215xWbNbSnZVnS tE2Ybzf53c52JAcR0z2WFmZxpSec11151gquouyU=
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Message-Id: <081BEE50-1291-430F-A06E-E093D398F6C6@trammell.ch>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_CA9D0CE9-D420-4525-867B-F0DE43987FC1"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3731.500.231\))
Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 18:49:34 +0200
In-Reply-To: <4B86DDF5-4E83-4E0B-BA69-2E640306C16D@ifi.uio.no>
Cc: taps WG <taps@ietf.org>
To: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
References: <168143232098.48127.10238475994925047982@ietfa.amsl.com> <0437EA4D-B0A3-4234-BCBF-9ACBBF01175F@ifi.uio.no> <4B86DDF5-4E83-4E0B-BA69-2E640306C16D@ifi.uio.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3731.500.231)
X-Infomaniak-Routing: alpha
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/Fz7Q9tZyOEQcdDpv4bPcv0lnpBA>
Subject: Re: [Taps] The last two reviews... issues for one of them are now filed in github
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 May 2023 16:50:22 -0000


> On 9 May 2023, at 23:57, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> 
> Friends and fans of TAPS, esteemed colleagues,
> 
> 
>> On May 9, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no <mailto:michawe@ifi.uio.no>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear Dale,
>> 
>> Many thanks for this very thoughtful review!  (and sorry for the delay)
>> I’ll give some answers below, as an author of the -impl and an editor of the -interface document - I hope my co-authors will agree with me, or comment if they do not.
> 
> (..)
> 
> 
>> As a way forward, my plan is to file issues in our github ( https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts ) for the smaller things below, in addition to one extra issue that says “check all modal words in the implementation draft” - and then address them with PRs there. I hope that’s ok with you?
> 
> Done.  And, it’s now clear to me that some of the “nits” are a bit more than just that - I am now quite sure that a bit of discussion time in the interim would be useful.

Agreed (and thanks)

> 
> Is anyone else (an -arch author  ;-)  ) going to do the same with https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/  ?  This looks like *much* less work.

I’m on it :)

Cheers,

Brian
> 
> Cheers,
> Michael
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> Taps@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email