IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS Activity Summary)

Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net> Sun, 17 September 2023 07:45 UTC

Return-Path: <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D84FDC14CE51 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 00:45:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.705
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.705 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=mnot.net header.b="gh1YIKH7"; dkim=fail (2048-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=messagingengine.com header.b="GftyIcnr"
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id IBS44y25jLg9 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 00:45:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from out2-smtp.messagingengine.com (out2-smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 173D3C15198F for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 00:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.nyi.internal [10.202.2.41]) by mailout.nyi.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id B18F55C00FC for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 03:39:14 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from mailfrontend1 ([10.202.2.162]) by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Sun, 17 Sep 2023 03:39:14 -0400
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mnot.net; h=cc :content-type:content-type:date:from:from:in-reply-to :mime-version:reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to; s=fm3; t= 1694936354; x=1695022754; bh=tE2dHk19lPloMoFhciyuv8h2DpycETwscVG w13ltXx4=; b=gh1YIKH7KJUa6cc+6OczfmXgRqevtwFM9Ozf9Ma3im2F7iMy0Ca d+vOiCZ2b3p0pqm91YU0rvsxykpCOmGDqkmKjkCdQcQPih9NR3rY51YTjxFx5nos W1ZEY36qQTFWxToaJHyWheNpnew552MjloxW+wYO1LjFz1yrELopYIYbciHq29y8 dWiqkw/DH9DTRWktRfE9Eo6cfLFdfl6f16f+TsjftDueFws+TgaWWloTsqG+jN+z +iTAkbanpKPNa0yP4LNEZMXcHAvbSZ+THzdmaRugcIZCHSiAyWYi5uVEg32iPnYW RgDVW+nMsvwcM10wBZ30S9G0n31C2BdtKeQ==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:content-type:content-type:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:mime-version :reply-to:sender:subject:subject:to:to:x-me-proxy:x-me-proxy :x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm2; t=1694936354; x= 1695022754; bh=tE2dHk19lPloMoFhciyuv8h2DpycETwscVGw13ltXx4=; b=G ftyIcnrTJVenGYlk9scdo697tZbqB4qjRo9QQGahbHej/jf492+nVViIWmbc4UlY 1GIZUeFVCQO0RFWyGhBVAeIRZXit/jsqK6nqDPKLCktz+9oNRlO5ujSnCZ4oLiNL RHK34JfsbDy77ux75/bcF/PbZtw7P1IcOxkosxZMFfi1x553Ss4mIrPKlOWDGuat TN6F7Hi2PAsuKcQxuGj8UENu0bTCtymI8Amng8HPX3xKiqD1GNUQBAMykuyb5w0n lKKja1n9TosFDqoOyeInosA/yypBlyZEehXDVMeuHanwkPFa2GQ9D8jQJyRtYI2z RGmqnfA8KuBLeeO3JFTVw==
X-ME-Sender: <xms:Iq0GZZxuQ2OVdxegb84siN4U3SJgZzCFl2xCoDCOOmKmqzXYbKtihA> <xme:Iq0GZZRc3GCLQ-26_hY9OXgCKv3T1aOFatkTXFHim452zI_OJR35r0Fu59G0Kz56h ExT5jJBEkr-njLwhg>
X-ME-Received: <xmr:Iq0GZTW70OCynxp_oqB7oSqs9z9mf4YkOLT4gmLVIUiCcOFu2Uxb3vrwiFSF91oWWg>
X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedviedrudejhedguddvfecutefuodetggdotefrod ftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfhrghsthforghilhdpqfgfvfdpuffrtefokffrpgfnqfgh necuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecupfhoucgurghtvgcufhhivghlugculdegledmne cujfgurheptggghffvufesrgdttdertddtjeenucfhrhhomheptfgvphhoshhithhorhih ucettghtihhvihhthicuufhumhhmrghrhicuuehothcuoeguohgpnhhothgprhgvphhlhi esmhhnohhtrdhnvghtqeenucggtffrrghtthgvrhhnpeekfedvudetjedvfeekheeiveeu gfefhfetteevgeffkefffeetffdvleehudeiteenucffohhmrghinhepghhithhhuhgsrd gtohhmnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrghrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhep ughopghnohhtpghrvghplhihsehmnhhothdrnhgvth
X-ME-Proxy: <xmx:Iq0GZbi_0BBB9AWcNhl3fFj2z1KxcHNZQXJN0qJRtfd7UtRz4_Lg2w> <xmx:Iq0GZbC1BD8t-Uer03r4OCzh9GL_gQe9SJpxy_vaTYz8xz6e8CiCrQ> <xmx:Iq0GZUIYZK8_fePi-vYL_5flxolamtjLbDdsz1J01v6dkF9U17GbjA> <xmx:Iq0GZe8NEBfsydK4f9kBA2NF4vBNcFgOJr4PfvATIccVhR6L_kszmg>
Feedback-ID: i1c3946f2:Fastmail
Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA for <taps@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Sep 2023 03:39:14 -0400 (EDT)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="===============7234014839553844349=="
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Repository Activity Summary Bot <do_not_reply@mnot.net>
To: taps@ietf.org
Message-Id: <20230917074552.173D3C15198F@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 00:45:51 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/KqW3RQncP5cNnF3rk6BtbIEa7Bc>
Subject: [Taps] Weekly github digest (TAPS Activity Summary)
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Sep 2023 07:45:56 -0000



Issues
------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+37/-2/💬19)
  37 issues created:
  - nits (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1355 [API] 
  - Wrong IP address in example (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1354 [API] 
  - Inclusive language (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1353 [API] [editorial] 
  - Clarify rcv backpressure (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1352 [API] 
  - What does worse performance mean? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1351 
  - s/datagram/UDP payload (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1350 [API] [editorial] 
  - MSS and PMTUD (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1349 [API] 
  - Later control of sender checksum coverage, and corruption / reliability (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1348 [API] 
  - Bounds on send and receive rate (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1347 [API] 
  - How to express "Full Coverage" (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1346 [API] 
  - 0-RTT property name (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1345 [API] 
  - HTTPS = TCL/TLS ? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1344 [API] 
  - Why didn't we overload WithIPAddress for multicast? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1343 [API] 
  - Service names should refer to IANA names; and "getservbyname" (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1342 [API] 
  - Port integer type (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1341 [API] 
  - Programmer can't know that all endpoints are the same service (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1340 [API] 
  - Define "represent the same host" (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1339 [API] 
  - Property names (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1338 [API] 
  - String encoding shouldn't assume a defined string representation (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1337 [API] [review] 
  - Contradicting Connection / Message properties (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1336 [API] [review] 
  - Scheduler property (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1335 [API] [review] 
  - Complex interactions between properties (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1334 [API] [review] 
  - WithProtocol TCP/TLS in an example (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1333 [API] [review] 
  - Usage of protocol identifiers (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1332 [API] 
  - How does an application learn allowed/available interface names? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1331 [API] 
  - Not just "IETF document in the RFC series" (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1330 [API] [review] 
  - Code location (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1329 [Implementation] [From a partial review] 
  - Example on QUIC? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1328 [Implementation] [From a partial review] 
  - Format suggestion to avoid too long line (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1327 [Implementation] [From a partial review] 
  - HTTP/3 suggestions and reference missing (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1326 [Implementation] [From a partial review] 
  - How to implement security considerations? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1325 [Implementation] [From a partial review] 
  - Change a few examples from IPv4/LTE to IPv6? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1324 [Implementation] 
  - Example style (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1323 [Implementation] 
  - IPv6 address representation and port number (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1322 [Implementation] 
  - Why batch sends? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1321 [Implementation] 
  - Why not QUIC? (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1320 [Implementation] 
  - Two nits in -impl (by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1319 [Implementation] 

  15 issues received 19 new comments:
  - #1354 Wrong IP address in example (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1354 [API] 
  - #1353 Inclusive language (2 by gorryfair, tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1353 [API] [editorial] 
  - #1352 Clarify rcv backpressure (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1352 [API] 
  - #1350 s/datagram/UDP payload (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1350 [API] [editorial] 
  - #1349 MSS and PMTUD (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1349 [API] 
  - #1348 Later control of sender checksum coverage, and corruption / reliability (1 by gorryfair)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1348 [API] 
  - #1346 How to express "Full Coverage" (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1346 [API] 
  - #1345 0-RTT property name (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1345 [API] 
  - #1341 Port integer type (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1341 [API] 
  - #1336 Contradicting Connection / Message properties (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1336 [API] [review] 
  - #1334 Complex interactions between properties (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1334 [API] [review] 
  - #1330 Not just "IETF document in the RFC series" (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1330 [API] [review] 
  - #1319 Two nits in -impl (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1319 [Implementation] 
  - #1275 How are IETF namespaces to be differentiated? (4 by gorryfair, mirjak, mwelzl, philsbln)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1275 [API] [discuss] 
  - #1267 s/TTL/hop limit ? (1 by mwelzl)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1267 [API] 

  2 issues closed:
  - Inclusive language https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1353 [API] [editorial] 
  - Protocol-specific properties or Generic properties https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/issues/1302 [API] [editorial] 



Pull requests
-------------
* ietf-tapswg/api-drafts (+2/-2/💬4)
  2 pull requests submitted:
  - Remove the use of "native" (by tfpauly)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1356 [editorial] 
  - Create IANA registry for Tansport Property Namespace  (by philsbln)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1318 

  1 pull requests received 4 new comments:
  - #1306 A title change to The Transport Service System? (4 by abrunstrom, gorryfair, tfpauly, zaheduzzaman)
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1306 [Architecture] [discuss] 

  2 pull requests merged:
  - Remove the use of "native"
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1356 [editorial] 
  - Generic Properties
    https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts/pull/1317 [API] 


Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts

v2.39.1 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status