[Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11

Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 16 April 2020 10:35 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Susan Hares via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: ops-dir@ietf.org
Cc: last-call@ietf.org, taps@ietf.org, draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.all@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <158703333468.25896.8984664151253035199@ietfa.amsl.com>
Reply-To: Susan Hares <shares@ndzh.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2020 03:35:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/OD0sxa-eVsJo91tBeLZ5r5782d8>
Subject: [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11

Reviewer: Susan Hares
Review result: Ready

Greetings:

This is an ops-dir review  that looks at the operational aspects of any draft. 

Overall: Thank you for a clear and well-written document. 

This draft is well written and clear.    One minor editorial nitty-nit.
One personal plea from the IDR  co-chair(WG that maintains BGP), 
and co-author of BGP (RFC4771).   

Personal plea: 
You've clear stated the BGP issue up front. 
 TCP MD5 is bad (due to privacy issues) and TCP-AO 
is not deployed..  Has the TAPs given any thought to 
what might be  a replacement that could utilize some of the modern 
TCP.   Would any of your co-authors be willing to chat about 
this issue? 

The  very minor editorial nitty-nit. 
Would you please check the order of the items in 
the pre-shared key import (PSKI) [p. 13-14] 
to see that it is the same order as the table.

[Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-… Susan Hares via Datatracker
Re: [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… Joseph Touch
Re: [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… Scharf, Michael
Re: [Taps] Opsdir telechat review of draft-ietf-t… Susan Hares
Re: [Taps] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Joseph Touch
Re: [Taps] [Last-Call] Opsdir telechat review of … Susan Hares