[Taps] IETF planning

[Aaron Falk <[e-mail]>]

Hi Folks-

So, we have these two docs and a rough agreement that they are complimentary.  Gorry suggests that they both progress as responsive to milestone 1:

 I suggest the two docs against the first milestone will help us
make  progress towards the next milestone faster. (Assuming we can keep
the two aligned, which seems quite doable). I can see also how the  docs
are useful to different people. I'd like to see both mature and provide
inputs to move forward.

Is there agreement on this?  I’ve heard no objections.  Assuming so, we should move on.

First, I would ask that the authors summarize the work remaining on each doc to the list and call out any topics requiring discussion at the Yokohama meeting.

Second, let’s hear some proposals for addressing the second milestone.  

2) Specify the subset of those Transport Services, as identified 
   in item 1, that end systems supporting TAPS will provide, and 
   give guidance on choosing among available mechanisms and 
   protocols.  Note that not all the capabilities of IETF Transport 
   protocols need to be exposed as Transport Services.