Re: [Taps] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-taps-transport-security-11

Hi Brian,

Thanks for the review! You can find an updated version of the document here:

https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html <https://ietf-tapswg.github.io/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security/draft-ietf-taps-transport-security.html>

The authors discussed, and believe that SSH, L2TP, and GRE do not expose significant new surfaces for transports and applications compared to the existing protocols surveyed. We did, however, add specific text and references to those protocols in the introduction as explanation.

Thanks,
Tommy

> On Apr 3, 2020, at 5:10 AM, Brian Haberman via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Brian Haberman
> Review result: Ready with Issues
> 
> This document is a survey of network security protocols and their interaction
> with transport and application protocols. It is clearly written and easy to
> read. I have a minor comment on the contents of this draft.
> 
> It is not abundantly clear what the criteria was for selecting the subset of
> security protocols included in this draft. Some notable omissions include SSH,
> L2TP, and GRE. These seem like interesting omissions given their popularity in
> a number of deployment scenarios. Not a showstopper in my opinion, but
> interesting to note.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> Taps@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps