[Taps] Concluded (Re: Consensus call on arch, interface, and impl, ACTION DUE by February 13th)
Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> Wed, 14 February 2024 23:12 UTC
Return-Path: <ietf@tenghardt.net>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 560B5C151520 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:12:55 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.106
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.106 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=tenghardt.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UyPe4ky7PTcm for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:12:50 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.hemio.de (mail.hemio.de [136.243.12.180]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9DDFFC15108B for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:12:49 -0800 (PST)
Received: from user.client.invalid (localhost [136.243.12.180]) by mail.hemio.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8DF4DBA; Thu, 15 Feb 2024 00:12:46 +0100 (CET)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=tenghardt.net; s=20170414; t=1707952367; bh=QXUNnreapijo/ZDGtYN+lxPnTvcZA5P/22sri1I7SvQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=uSXP5yf0W7ZeBqGRhSrjysmnjHaTeFVNvHuDqjcnbKSTBURk5UajqAW5WFsDvQ2CP sxUe1Fz7Q3TwoZx1G8X99MZ2VsoVv7MtxnNZQfC1cWm5PZk83XEpzX3fSA7ZQhWhPG nLvH7384jF+mAKCtBeRYOYIPux0tBM5EQ8mV0ne0wxRPlllX4lyyaBFMcctqIEEWWG U/4j9BnnyDcYgsPuRiFZrItOgWL42qgGqSl3TLLylAohC0dSX8SJX+aDd+J2UpFoTt xoFHMJxvHNe3i6FrsFvujs6b1NAXYjrf7Mg9QM1smCw7a38WMmRVYHPKbI1qLVhx0p rou5AY0hqouOg==
Message-ID: <dafff5d6-6a92-982a-02f1-dfc37c196c1c@tenghardt.net>
Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 15:12:44 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:102.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/102.11.0
To: "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Cc: "Zaheduzzaman Sarker (Nokia)" <zaheduzzaman.sarker@nokia.com>
References: <d3e5ce23-7869-808d-301b-45f1edead012@tenghardt.net> <48C78E45-654B-4934-BC2A-445A95C5D35A@apple.com>
Content-Language: en-US
From: Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net>
In-Reply-To: <48C78E45-654B-4934-BC2A-445A95C5D35A@apple.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/ZxMvfwAZj6BZNhFVA8OF-V6eAbs>
Subject: [Taps] Concluded (Re: Consensus call on arch, interface, and impl, ACTION DUE by February 13th)
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2024 23:12:55 -0000
Dear TAPS, The consensus call has concluded. The chairs have not seen any comments other than Tommy's words of encouragement below, thank you Tommy! So we'll conclude that there are no objections and that the documents are ready. Thanks again, all! Best, Reese On 2/7/24 07:14, Tommy Pauly wrote: > As an author on these documents, I do want to reiterate what Reese said — thanks to all for the work on polishing these by everyone who contributed! I do think these are ready to go, and have been improved by the IESG feedback. > > If you’re not an author but reading along, please do check the latest versions and verify that these look good! > > Thanks, > Tommy > >> On Jan 30, 2024, at 6:59 AM, Reese Enghardt <ietf@tenghardt.net> wrote: >> >> Dear TAPS Working Group, >> >> The document authors have worked through all the IESG reviews and made a number of revisions to our three core documents. >> >> The authors, shepherds, and chairs believe that the revision process is now complete. >> >> We are now running a two-week consensus call on all three documents: >> >> - draft-ietf-taps-arch https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-arch/ >> >> - draft-ietf-taps-interface https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-interface/ >> >> - draft-ietf-taps-impl https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-impl/ >> >> >> Please send any comments to taps@ietf.org by February 13th. >> >> Thank you again for the great work everyone. >> >> Best, >> Reese (for the TAPS chairs) >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Taps mailing list >> Taps@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps > _______________________________________________ > Taps mailing list > Taps@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
- [Taps] Consensus call on arch, interface, and imp… Reese Enghardt
- Re: [Taps] Consensus call on arch, interface, and… Tommy Pauly
- [Taps] Concluded (Re: Consensus call on arch, int… Reese Enghardt
- Re: [Taps] Concluded (Re: Consensus call on arch,… Gorry Fairhurst
- Re: [Taps] Concluded (Re: Consensus call on arch,… Zaheduzzaman Sarker