IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] Authors' meeting, Friday 08:30 - 10:00, VIP B (IAB room)

"Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch> Wed, 20 November 2019 15:15 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@trammell.ch>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1D79120805 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:15:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OnyV5qH9pa-D for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:15:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch (smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch [128.65.195.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7359E120024 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 07:15:46 -0800 (PST)
Received: from smtp-2-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (smtp-2-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch [10.5.36.108]) by smtp-sh2.infomaniak.ch (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-8+deb8u2) with ESMTP id xAKFFijW179963 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO) for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:15:44 +0100
Received: from [10.128.30.18] (unknown [61.8.238.244]) by smtp-2-0001.mail.infomaniak.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2E64210037F1A for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Nov 2019 16:15:43 +0100 (CET)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
From: "Brian Trammell (IETF)" <ietf@trammell.ch>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 23:15:41 +0800
Message-Id: <8A8FE49C-39CA-42CC-86EA-8B07BC5C3F01@trammell.ch>
In-Reply-To: <D3414F05-4632-4FA3-AE61-4E98C0FBBE20@trammell.ch>
References: <D3414F05-4632-4FA3-AE61-4E98C0FBBE20@trammell.ch>
To: taps WG <taps@ietf.org>
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
X-Antivirus: Dr.Web (R) for Unix mail servers drweb plugin ver.6.0.2.8
X-Antivirus-Code: 0x100000
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/a3MGfvIfeKCoNww3ghAbA3iUXZw>
Subject: Re: [Taps] Authors' meeting, Friday 08:30 - 10:00, VIP B (IAB room)
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2019 15:15:50 -0000

Greetings, all

The Friday time, it turns out, is less than ideal; I’ll have trouble showing up early enough to be useful and at least one other  author told me they’d have to bow out of a breakfast meeting to make it.

Jet lag, it’s a hell of a drug.

Short notice, I know, but would people be available for an authors’ meeting / editing session tomorrow (Thursday) over lunch? The idea is to bring food and meet in the IESG room (Mirja has offered to reserve it to us); if we can make good progress there, then we’re done. if not, I still have the Friday IAB room reservation.

In either case the plan is to sit down and write, discussing suggested text and merging PRs to take advantage of higher bandwidth of everyone being here.

Thanks, cheers, and apologies for the organizational skill,

Brian 



> On 19 Nov 2019, at 18:46, Brian Trammell (IETF) <ietf@trammell.ch> wrote:
> 
> Greetings, all,
> 
> We'll have a TAPS author's meeting (laptops open, writing PRs) from 8:30 - 10:00 on Friday in the VIP B room at the venue (across from the Olivia / Sophia rooms, since the signage is suboptimal).
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Brian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email