[Taps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-udp-06: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Mon, 11 September 2017 16:05 UTC

MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-udp@ietf.org, Zaheduzzaman Sarker <Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com>, taps-chairs@ietf.org, Zaheduzzaman.Sarker@ericsson.com, taps@ietf.org
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <150514592831.9770.11967079209247120832.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2017 09:05:28 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/jfykIwXCKHMbejB7fnFrpaHf_90>
Subject: [Taps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-udp-06: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-udp-06: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-taps-transports-usage-udp/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Question: Given this is pass 1 (describing the (abstract) API as defined in the
spec), why is there a LISTEN for UDP?

[Taps] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ie… Mirja Kühlewind