Re: [Taps] Transport Services (taps) WG Virtual Meeting: 2023-05-15

[Reese Enghardt <[e-mail]>]

Dear TAPS,

Thanks all for participating in the Interim meeting just now!

You can find the minutes, as well as Tommy's slides, in the 
Datatracker: https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/interim-2023-taps-01/session/taps

Please let the chairs know about any changes to the minutes or would 
like to contribute by co-authoring a mapping document.

Best,
Reese


On 5/15/23 08:01, Reese Enghardt wrote:
> Hi TAPS,
>
> Here's the link to join again - Interim meeting will start shortly
>
> https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=10057741-d86c-47d5-a46e-5bebe9cda598 
>
>
> Best,
> Reese
>
>
> On 5/11/23 16:36, Reese Enghardt wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Thanks folks for these suggestions!
>>
>> The chairs agree that it makes sense to discuss the open issues, and 
>> we'll allocate time at the beginning of next week's agenda.
>>
>> We'll also talk about next steps, including the possibility of having 
>> a formal TAPS WG meeting at IETF 117.
>>
>> Here's the updated agenda:
>>
>> - Issues for draft-ietf-taps-arch, -interface, -impl
>> - Implementation update
>> - What can we do now to foster deployment of TAPS?
>> - Discoverability/configuration
>> - Mappings: QUIC, HTTP, any others?
>> - Next steps
>>
>>
>> Looking forward to seeing you on Monday May 15, 15:00 UTC!
>>
>> https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=10057741-d86c-47d5-a46e-5bebe9cda598 
>>
>>
>>
>> Best,
>> Reese
>>
>>
>> On 5/11/23 07:32, Philipp S. Tiesel wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I second this plan.
>>>
>>> We should also talk briefly whether we want to have a WG meeting at 
>>> IETF117 to carry status and beginning chartering discussion into a 
>>> broader audience.
>>>
>>>> On 10. May 2023, at 22:55, Tommy Pauly 
>>>> <tpauly=[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I support using at least part of the time to triage and discuss the 
>>>> open issues (thanks to Michael for filing all of those!!).
>>>>
>>>> I’m happy to make some slides about implementation/deployment 
>>>> thoughts, but would welcome others who do implementations to also 
>>>> provide input.
>>>>
>>>> Best,
>>>> Tommy
>>>>
>>>>> On May 8, 2023, at 1:10 PM, Michael Welzl <[e-mail]> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Not related to presentations, BUT:  we also have some work to do:
>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/ 
>>>>>
>>>>> and:
>>>>> https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/bpBk8QxZMLksr3ZuROtf2_BXYdI/ 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> (any others that require work? Have I missed anything?)
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think, should we also do our usual thing and use some 
>>>>> interim time to discuss issues and PRs where we address these 
>>>>> reviews?  This of course would need people to get active before 
>>>>> that…  me, I’ll try to get started! I wanted to start filing 
>>>>> issues to begin addressing the latter review at least a week ago, 
>>>>> but I’m lagging behind.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> Michael
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> On May 8, 2023, at 3:54 PM, Reese Enghardt <[e-mail]> 
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Dear TAPS,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This is a quick and friendly reminder that our interim meeting is 
>>>>>> coming up in a week.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So far, we have not received any indication of interest to 
>>>>>> present. Please let the chairs know if you do want to present 
>>>>>> anything related to the agenda items below.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Looking forward to seeing you next week!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best,
>>>>>> Reese
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 4/17/23 12:17, IESG Secretary wrote:
>>>>>>> The Transport Services (taps) WG will hold a virtual interim 
>>>>>>> meeting on
>>>>>>> 2023-05-15 from 08:00 to 10:00 America/Los_Angeles (15:00 to 
>>>>>>> 17:00 UTC).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agenda:
>>>>>>> Preliminary agenda:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - Implementation update
>>>>>>> - What can we do now to foster deployment of TAPS?
>>>>>>> - Discoverability/configuration
>>>>>>> - Mappings: QUIC, HTTP, any others?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Please let the chairs know if you'd like to present on any of 
>>>>>>> these. If nobody presents, we'll have a free-form discussion.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As mentioned in the original thread, the chairs are wondering if 
>>>>>>> it'll be time to conclude TAPS once the core documents have made 
>>>>>>> their way to the RFC editor, unless we see evidence of 
>>>>>>> substantial interest and activity regarding further milestones. 
>>>>>>> This includes editorial activity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Information about remote participation:
>>>>>>> https://meetings.conf.meetecho.com/interim/?short=10057741-d86c-47d5-a46e-5bebe9cda598 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>> A calendar subscription for all taps meetings is available at
>>>>>>> https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/upcoming.ics?show=taps
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Taps mailing list
>>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Taps mailing list
>>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Taps mailing list
>>>>> [e-mail]
>>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Taps mailing list
>>>> [e-mail]
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Taps mailing list
>>> [e-mail]
>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Taps mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps
>
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps