IETF Logo Mail Archive

[Taps] The last two reviews... issues for one of them are now filed in github

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Tue, 09 May 2023 21:58 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B5BA6C1524A3 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2023 14:58:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.996
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.996 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=ifi.uio.no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OOx-jIIkkMvE for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 9 May 2023 14:57:58 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out04.uio.no (mail-out04.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::76]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2D0E6C14CE47 for <taps@ietf.org>; Tue, 9 May 2023 14:57:57 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ifi.uio.no; s=key2103; h=Message-Id:In-Reply-To:To:References:Date:Subject:Mime-Version: Content-Type:From:Sender:Reply-To:Cc:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=X38p65scQMrMQ/6xPRz9hqRoHMeycr8J+86xMFoObPI=; b=S+0ibeLuws2MvpfReXsS/5ChXz fe763D11oUNd04r1hBZfl2l8UUav4OhqRhiMDpkklXLcofVTGVL7T5lgtmhaij1fCR/qfegl7Jbic GK3xb3SJ3cU+uivIx9X/7/AUD0CM8fqvg1YdDsXAtOXSr9W+EU8/i7N3FhITrbvUIEJ3e1OD02xtL J+4C7qci4A8/lF7Ncy+ZCBktmLMY9Jy0wGuKnpQlrxzP2w7dUz/m2LfWwrZA0HeuzLxYEXhRVzSZj fMD/Njl8SH29gKZuCEKs20Hpp8vBxqBwv7VcLXMAV2dj4+g/7ZTneF16pa9cVn2L24BZwK3YmbOVv pqr50uzw==;
Received: from mail-mx05.uio.no ([129.240.10.49]) by mail-out04.uio.no with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_ECDSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1pwVLF-008PTJ-2t for taps@ietf.org; Tue, 09 May 2023 23:57:53 +0200
Received: from [131.94.186.12] (helo=smtpclient.apple) by mail-mx05.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:ECDHE-ECDSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1pwVLE-0003CD-1d for taps@ietf.org; Tue, 09 May 2023 23:57:53 +0200
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_4DD8D781-79C8-4E5A-BE33-A6629162C6E4"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 16.0 \(3696.120.41.1.1\))
Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 17:57:50 -0400
References: <168143232098.48127.10238475994925047982@ietfa.amsl.com> <0437EA4D-B0A3-4234-BCBF-9ACBBF01175F@ifi.uio.no>
To: taps WG <taps@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <0437EA4D-B0A3-4234-BCBF-9ACBBF01175F@ifi.uio.no>
Message-Id: <4B86DDF5-4E83-4E0B-BA69-2E640306C16D@ifi.uio.no>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3696.120.41.1.1)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx05.uio.no: 131.94.186.12 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=131.94.186.12; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=smtpclient.apple;
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-4.9, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, AWL=0.060, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5)
X-UiO-Scanned: 2B1D8C8EAEF8D81C9EAEA1788E87E6FBEB7A93CC
X-UiOonly: ACD3A1D4D0ECE9B8B0B2A3731EE8C0198D280010
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/leTvrSkOxFBe_4QswwYr48AvmGo>
Subject: [Taps] The last two reviews... issues for one of them are now filed in github
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 09 May 2023 21:58:02 -0000

Friends and fans of TAPS, esteemed colleagues,


> On May 9, 2023, at 7:39 AM, Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> 
> Dear Dale,
> 
> Many thanks for this very thoughtful review!  (and sorry for the delay)
> I’ll give some answers below, as an author of the -impl and an editor of the -interface document - I hope my co-authors will agree with me, or comment if they do not.

(..)


> As a way forward, my plan is to file issues in our github ( https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts <https://github.com/ietf-tapswg/api-drafts> ) for the smaller things below, in addition to one extra issue that says “check all modal words in the implementation draft” - and then address them with PRs there. I hope that’s ok with you?

Done.  And, it’s now clear to me that some of the “nits” are a bit more than just that - I am now quite sure that a bit of discussion time in the interim would be useful.

Is anyone else (an -arch author  ;-)  ) going to do the same with https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/ <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/last-call/ijkQhWRrGkWfS-cxx_2ylPrEEGA/>  ?  This looks like *much* less work.

Cheers,
Michael

v2.31.3 | Report a Bug | By Email | System Status