Re: [Taps] Draft-ietf-taps-arch-08 review

Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Wed, 05 August 2020 15:31 UTC

Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2893A0B74 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Bc7VbpLrDfKS for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-il1-x12c.google.com (mail-il1-x12c.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::12c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AE20E3A0B53 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-il1-x12c.google.com with SMTP id x1so17403453ilp.7 for <taps@ietf.org>; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 08:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=nMsPDaK3Zvci62RQRbgvRDxYmJFTbbv8IroN67KhsU8=; b=j9bKt9QUdx1NDRCV5jX/4eUKZ3uz5rZQAsdVE2izeVKyHSqdIBaOfMBvHMoh94aifz M4BfFsjCOhC5P+fwlb0vYMcNRUeBIVsqVmwDYqs7vJouCBj42Ll2R03SzBRMVF9q4bub zS8vh05oZlys+GxftErNf4swWQPOOoeXwYepMn91c8qkJ4233MUWLP7I4xeLVmoUF6dN HHhT9hNK8ERES8HZnYE9mJI5pTsGVzb8d8rdLem1hpcTr+1CBJo+EfhacYQlUcqwwXlh //rnt4gGCM9jftuwseV4Wx5O1zXt1DZocJlga1PhH9O1PM/qL1SBLdxSI6DRbul4Rn/p rQ/g==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=nMsPDaK3Zvci62RQRbgvRDxYmJFTbbv8IroN67KhsU8=; b=RO6eMdz5uYzSGRoJBFxLXE8u5teF1XvJ743xAhokt07GQ8803ERTnmpk+HMhof2le/ iMIaqg7mFWmbK8S5PipkXF6XTnX4w3vRRY0XGAqmoCno24nRXVepVGi7oxX4DxrEzEBB sWySOdi6RfJBnydgqG3kNrYq/ML6kZjro+uui/M4tKXF4F/Z6qRegOk3dgHjXqiTiyM+ a80LugfPlkJ1SDdHs1o1/Yxo0JfxS/+CJnLJ+ZTErUAWpBAS+mfYh3dMV49BDWxmsPYz NUv1bFljd6g+xM1/0j6AlFn+8yn7e9L7mt9wlBjP/Hh9csDlIkFYxuAN1k/SxwG5KKBW iEXg==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5301IwUhfnp1QPqQSCVDuI0wWUmfSghU1XQ7HkeNpTZyVwKbxCaH Vef+9b0ShSlGrsUOL/xw+0z8w22gC8aHuTvv4vttbX4i
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzvKqQy6sdbiRdBqNHEKu8CEBr0FcGnONVTwIQC0HT+lRDx/9YMTUUGBA57wQeP1cu2eyBbEv6z1Rf1E8DTtYw=
X-Received: by 2002:a92:1f0f:: with SMTP id i15mr4723707ile.237.1596641512662; Wed, 05 Aug 2020 08:31:52 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAM4esxSag_6R9Wyz2znwuphw-LySqYLhhS43GZn4JE67tX+6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAM4esxSag_6R9Wyz2znwuphw-LySqYLhhS43GZn4JE67tX+6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Aug 2020 08:31:41 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxTySUBDZoXoMpi5T5i=Zhwdp+Lxg+Zjccw+hrd=fesZAA@mail.gmail.com>
To: taps WG <taps@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000322d1205ac2312fc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/nuDnofq1i5M5ZVLCbjKY2ERGt1M>
Subject: Re: [Taps] Draft-ietf-taps-arch-08 review
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2020 15:31:55 -0000

Also the authors should nominate a handful of editors to limit the byline.

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 3:26 PM Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> wrote:

> I have read this document and believe it is ready for publication.
>
> However, is it worthwhile to include something here about extensibility?
> If new transports introduce new concepts, should we any requirements of the
> api to have extension points for those concepts?
>