IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] IETF planning

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Fri, 23 October 2015 07:22 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 364611B2E4A for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:22:46 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.909
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.909 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1nhSTYBtx9aP for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out5.uio.no (mail-out5.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:10::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5329A1B2E05 for <taps@ietf.org>; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 00:22:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx4.uio.no ([129.240.10.45]) by mail-out5.uio.no with esmtp (Exim 4.80.1) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1ZpWgU-0004oy-9e; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:22:42 +0200
Received: from 173.179.249.62.customer.cdi.no ([62.249.179.173] helo=[192.168.0.101]) by mail-mx4.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) user michawe (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1ZpWgT-0004An-QN; Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:22:42 +0200
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_52B3EE5B-10CD-4502-AA60-B946B49A50C6"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 8.2 \(2104\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <64271754-EED2-4322-BB0E-51CB66365682@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 09:22:41 +0200
Message-Id: <CF05B5AB-7993-4CE8-9527-280F367FD71F@ifi.uio.no>
References: <64271754-EED2-4322-BB0E-51CB66365682@gmail.com>
To: Aaron Falk <aaron.falk@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.2104)
X-UiO-SPF-Received:
X-UiO-Ratelimit-Test: rcpts/h 7 msgs/h 3 sum rcpts/h 12 sum msgs/h 6 total rcpts 34257 max rcpts/h 54 ratelimit 0
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: C126594B74C4A584EDD203A883609E0604154D52
X-UiO-SPAM-Test: remote_host: 62.249.179.173 spam_score: -49 maxlevel 80 minaction 2 bait 0 mail/h: 3 total 1912 max/h 14 blacklist 0 greylist 0 ratelimit 0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/uIpi1g-bWa9GmVvxcKG7_wD2CoE>
Cc: "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Taps] IETF planning
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussions on Transport Services <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 23 Oct 2015 07:22:46 -0000

Hi,

About this:

> Second, let’s hear some proposals for addressing the second milestone.  
> 
> 2) Specify the subset of those Transport Services, as identified
>    in item 1, that end systems supporting TAPS will provide, and
>    give guidance on choosing among available mechanisms and
>    protocols.  Note that not all the capabilities of IETF Transport
>    protocols need to be exposed as Transport Services.

I think this should be based on the services in draft-welzl-taps-transports. Then, isn’t it a bit premature to worry about this second item? Yes I think we can progress fast with draft-welzl-taps-transports, but still it’s only the first version now. I think this item should therefore wait a bit.

Cheers,
Michael

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email