[Taps] Draft-ietf-taps-arch-08 review
Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com> Tue, 04 August 2020 22:26 UTC
Return-Path: <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 968EC3A1185 for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:26:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.098
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.098 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UTSvsY59grrt for <taps@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-io1-xd35.google.com (mail-io1-xd35.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::d35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 82CF23A111E for <taps@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Aug 2020 15:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-io1-xd35.google.com with SMTP id j8so31564559ioe.9 for <taps@ietf.org>; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:26:46 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aUiS2TJKJXob9W1icrg7T4jxeD2bOmDyLRbGxC3mjVQ=; b=kvBTo13u9slg+wx4spZcfg2OFmgIpcgdEvZhOgouahRzk3HO5P+dDlPyEeqlywXAI2 DrH8Ol1/7lpgouJrX9b3Fvb+lPf7GWzWw4J0MpkKqG0HcquDdjBLjL2KU2qR4/VJOPLK FPM8ZPmHcgAUQuKfqwY7J35czFYraVdHqfimQuCmFAZeXmUJhpQ6vmyonF7LdATtQVPa fM/gX+jD/6oyN2Iq/GSdcjfDgBsQSu8W7+cablI0BWbiJ0nj95ltT53pMpxgq+wrEG+e AJrUHyO0zdzm2n1ZgG+YPh/0C0qXUgrgoNysT1Zv/o9VlFs9HPmtNIvgRneUbFjtVbfo mEMw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=aUiS2TJKJXob9W1icrg7T4jxeD2bOmDyLRbGxC3mjVQ=; b=ui33g198+x5R1VAOIJJKE/FyzZnESDGivXsi4hX2sHNd4P+Hylpn6ENchid6O9SOb6 opkUwIuzLwNXZQoZiUEv9j1qlpCdAOff0s6yBVRZHlKU33qquArNFT0HP5vBngZ3Lhk9 7YTLeTqQlo0o7p7Zl05Bmz7vCQAkN4lcBqeh46rWF2TH8/VlDc/VzNmYqbibWjRvu6bD FtnThyu0GsOZH88Py62H+fDCtmS4IBO/eKAIcu8CXx76d7ma2ysm6k64gpbTSpZJ4i4Y JkaB5pm5AhzI3vuDPaYq/zVFcn45GpeM/pmys1fKBHAONizH+yczplmg7YY+DKmqqK81 wz9A==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533bQ+OpBK6HKYEcYUL5ilgCwLakAC6D2t115LHLn0qN3iGdiv/r PNLvqFL6QY1HWAJ1APJwA7yqjRfaWAXU1tYSvtWnDcoZ
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyVRkhDXwxZfe2wsGIaJHM2dwbCbWBU5Q14uI8kIMEZlE8cEGmqdxJGoCxIPG/IfmQcJtuUqis11JVkb3pRgoU=
X-Received: by 2002:a6b:c504:: with SMTP id v4mr234358iof.20.1596580005591; Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:26:45 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Martin Duke <martin.h.duke@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 15:26:35 -0700
Message-ID: <CAM4esxSag_6R9Wyz2znwuphw-LySqYLhhS43GZn4JE67tX+6tQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: taps WG <taps@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000016bfab05ac14c03a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/uuuvwdTgDSh-RMus28j8BkAmMZk>
Subject: [Taps] Draft-ietf-taps-arch-08 review
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Aug 2020 22:26:48 -0000
I have read this document and believe it is ready for publication. However, is it worthwhile to include something here about extensibility? If new transports introduce new concepts, should we any requirements of the api to have extension points for those concepts?
- [Taps] Draft-ietf-taps-arch-08 review Martin Duke
- Re: [Taps] Draft-ietf-taps-arch-08 review Martin Duke
- Re: [Taps] Draft-ietf-taps-arch-08 review Tommy Pauly