IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10

Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no> Sat, 22 September 2018 20:47 UTC

Return-Path: <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
X-Original-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: taps@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 411E7130E5B; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:47:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.201
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.201 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ig_iTf3F_1fa; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:47:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-out02.uio.no (mail-out02.uio.no [IPv6:2001:700:100:8210::71]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7EC9412426A; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 13:47:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-mx01.uio.no ([129.240.10.26]) by mail-out02.uio.no with esmtps (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1g3onz-0004Ol-8a; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:47:07 +0200
Received: from 58.116.34.95.customer.cdi.no ([95.34.116.58] helo=[10.0.0.7]) by mail-mx01.uio.no with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) user michawe (Exim 4.91) (envelope-from <michawe@ifi.uio.no>) id 1g3ony-0001op-9V; Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:47:07 +0200
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Michael Welzl <michawe@ifi.uio.no>
In-Reply-To: <153755698602.7385.1208927554172233101@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 22:48:42 +0200
Cc: ops-dir@ietf.org, draft-ietf-taps-minset.all@ietf.org, ietf@ietf.org, "taps@ietf.org" <taps@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <7C959283-AFBA-4C24-839A-C6FCBC3EF4BB@ifi.uio.no>
References: <153755698602.7385.1208927554172233101@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
X-UiO-SPF-Received: Received-SPF: neutral (mail-mx01.uio.no: 95.34.116.58 is neither permitted nor denied by domain of ifi.uio.no) client-ip=95.34.116.58; envelope-from=michawe@ifi.uio.no; helo=[10.0.0.7];
X-UiO-Spam-info: not spam, SpamAssassin (score=-5.0, required=5.0, autolearn=disabled, TVD_RCVD_IP=0.001, UIO_MAIL_IS_INTERNAL=-5, uiobl=NO, uiouri=NO)
X-UiO-Scanned: 8DAA90C41EBE5AF7EB55FE5647EBFDE9567C6580
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/taps/xOv7Gti3gYf7KkmGZ1_DZyY_IlI>
Subject: Re: [Taps] Opsdir last call review of draft-ietf-taps-minset-10
X-BeenThere: taps@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "IETF Transport Services \(TAPS\) Working Group" <taps.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/taps/>
List-Post: <mailto:taps@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps>, <mailto:taps-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2018 20:47:15 -0000

Dear Linda,

Thanks for your feedback!
I’d like to address your last comment, but I’m not sure how. I agree with what you say, but it sounds as if you felt provoked by a specific sentence or paragraph - could you please point me at the text that you think needs changing?

Thanks!

Cheers,
Michael


> On Sep 21, 2018, at 9:09 PM, Linda Dunbar <ldunbar@huawei.com> wrote:
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Ready
> 
> Hi,
> 
> I have reviewed this document as part of the Operational directorate's ongoing
> effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG.  These
> comments were written with the intent of improving the operational aspects of
> the IETF drafts. Comments that are not addressed in last call may be included
> in AD reviews during the IESG review.  Document editors and WG chairs should
> treat these comments just like any other last call comments.
> 
> Reviewer: Linda Dunbar
> Review result: Almost Ready,  with comments
> 
> During my review period, the authors have updated the drafts twice, which have
> addressed many of  my previous comments well.
> 
> Only one more comment: Can you provide some sample "Applications" that actually
> do differently depending on the Host OS'  Transport capability? All the
> "Applications" I know of usually finalize on which Transport Protocols to use
> and which transport layer capability is necessary and can only be placed on the
> Host OS that meet the requirement.
> 
> Thank you.
> 
> Linda Dunbar
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Taps mailing list
> Taps@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/taps

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email