Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF proposal
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com> Thu, 30 May 2013 07:05 UTC
Return-Path: <prvs=18621efcb2=gonzalo.camarillo@ericsson.com>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 5FDCD21F96AC for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Thu, 30 May 2013 00:05:33 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.795
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.795 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.454,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_SE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Vrja0Q-BLkZW for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 30 May 2013 00:05:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailgw7.ericsson.se (mailgw7.ericsson.se [193.180.251.48]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1EB621F96AA for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Thu, 30 May 2013 00:05:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-AuditID: c1b4fb30-b7f9e6d000002643-a1-51a6fa35d22d
Received: from esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (Unknown_Domain [153.88.253.125])
by mailgw7.ericsson.se (Symantec Mail Security) with SMTP id
F2.37.09795.53AF6A15; Thu, 30 May 2013 09:05:25 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [131.160.126.100] (153.88.115.8) by
esessmw0237.eemea.ericsson.se (153.88.115.91) with Microsoft SMTP Server id
8.3.279.1; Thu, 30 May 2013 09:05:24 +0200
Message-ID: <51A6FA34.9030804@ericsson.com>
Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 10:05:24 +0300
From: Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64;
rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
References: <00bc01ce5ac5$862f0a50$928d1ef0$@unizar.es>
<51A5B7FA.9050609@neclab.eu>
In-Reply-To: <51A5B7FA.9050609@neclab.eu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFlrJLMWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsUyM+Jvra7pr2WBBue7VS22HNOz6Oi7ymZx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Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org, spencer@wonderhamster.org, jsaldana@unizar.es
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF proposal
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 07:05:33 -0000
Hi, > All Transport Area WGs sounds like a good idea. It would be good to > double check what WGs out of RAI should be on the conflict list. in addition to Dan's suggestions, I would add MMUSIC as well. Cheers, Gonzalo
- [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF pro… Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF… Martin Stiemerling
- Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF… Dan Wing
- Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF… Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF… Jose Saldana