[tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF in London

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Fri, 20 December 2013 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B85A81ADEBF; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:25:37 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.738
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.738 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.538, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ExqripGsv575; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:25:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es []) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4BF81ADED7; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 01:25:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es []) by huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id rBK9PO74028085; Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:25:24 +0100
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>, <tsv-area@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 10:25:32 +0100
Message-ID: <00c401cefd65$6e8ef570$4bace050$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00C5_01CEFD6D.D05420C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac79ZUO9+o1eWvDOTZW4bKGOX0YCWw==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@googlemail.com>, 'Spencer Dawkins' <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: [tcmtf] TCMTF-Feedback about a possible BoF in London
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 20 Dec 2013 09:25:37 -0000

Hi all,


After the feedback received in the BoF in Berlin, we have updated the TCM-TF
charter and the two drafts. We have tried to solve all the problems raised
during the session.


Our plan is to request a new BoF in London next March, so we would like to
know your opinion about these two questions:



1.  Is the new, reduced scope of TCM-TF suitable to form a working group?



2. We would like to kindly ask people who think that a TCM-TF Working group
should be formed, to come forward and send an e-mail to the
tsv-area@ietf.org  mailing list stating it.



This feedback will allow us to get a better idea of the convenience of a


The new charter is here:

This is the old one (presented in Berlin):


In these links you can see the differences between the new versions of the
drafts and the old ones:





The main improvements are:


- TCP optimization has been removed

- The classification of the scenarios has been refined and improved. Some of
them have been removed

- A section about energy consumption has been added to the main draft

- A reference to the potential problem of the MTU and packet loss has been

- The problem of the added delays is studied in detail in the second draft


- The improvements of the charter are summarized here:



Best regards,