IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2

FERNANDO PASCUAL BLANCO <fpb@tid.es> Thu, 10 January 2013 10:10 UTC

Return-Path: <fpb@tid.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 13F3921F849A for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:10:58 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.798
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.798 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.500, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OkXfjZvCap9D for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:10:55 -0800 (PST)
Received: from correo-bck.tid.es (correo-bck.tid.es [195.235.93.200]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CA38921F8472 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 02:10:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from sbrightmailg02.hi.inet (Sbrightmailg02.hi.inet [10.95.78.105]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MGE00BB5MY427@tid.hi.inet> for tcmtf@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:10:52 +0100 (MET)
Received: from vanvan (vanvan.hi.inet [10.95.78.49]) by sbrightmailg02.hi.inet (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 6D.B1.02896.BA39EE05; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:10:51 +0100 (CET)
Received: from correo.tid.es (mailhost.hi.inet [10.95.64.100]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTPS id <0MGE00B7KMXP27@tid.hi.inet> for tcmtf@ietf.org; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 11:10:51 +0100 (MET)
Received: from EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet ([169.254.2.223]) by ex10-htcas3-mad.hi.inet ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:58:35 +0100
Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:01:24 +0000
From: FERNANDO PASCUAL BLANCO <fpb@tid.es>
In-reply-to: <A3179A2C9AAEE647BE70AC4C7881D5FB01775E6A@sluga.fer.hr>
X-Originating-IP: [10.95.64.115]
To: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Mirko_Su=BEnjevi=E6?= <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr>, "jsaldana@unizar.es" <jsaldana@unizar.es>, "tcmtf@ietf.org" <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Message-id: <F5EDC35DF914C1428C28E149F10463A252895425@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_1N4WKeIuUnwSqT0JGSK2cg)"
Content-language: en-US
Accept-Language: en-US
Thread-topic: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
Thread-index: Ac3uTNeTbO+aCk7ITXS7wkpgZ6Gw0gABangwADG+O4A=
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/14.2.5.121010
X-AuditID: 0a5f4e69-b7f636d000000b50-ce-50ee93ab5352
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFtrJKsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFe9nqLtm8rsAgwdfWCx2fd7A6MDosWTJ T6YAxigum5TUnMyy1CJ9uwSujJNfr7MVnPat2Pz7NHsDY69LFyMnh4SAicSXpkNsELaYxIV7 64FsLg4hgW2MEoc//mcCSQgJ/GCUWHTNFiIxk1Hi+4LTLCAJFgFViTl737GC2GwCWhKn764C iwsLuEs0fG1jBLE5BVwkWqecY4HYoCDx59xjFpBBIgITGSV2dC8B28AskCLxdeEGsAZeAW+J W/u6mCBsQYkfk++xQNTkSkx9sB2qXlyiufUmWJwR6Ozvp9aAxUUEPCRa3s1j72LkALKtJNYc FgUJiwroSbQdO8MOcYOAxJI955khbFGJl4//sU5gFJuFZNssJNtmIdkGYetJPDs1C8rWlli2 8DUzhK0rcenhOlYI20zizf+JbMhqFjByrGIUK04qykzPKMlNzMxJNzDSy8jUy8xLLdnECInH zB2My3eqHGIU4GBU4uFNqHsXIMSaWFZcmXuIUZKDSUmU90A/UIgvKT+lMiOxOCO+qDQntfgQ owQHs5IIb8j2twFCvCmJlVWpRfkwKRkODiUJ3luTgNoEi1LTUyvSMnOASQcmzcTBCdLOA9S+ BKSGt7ggMbc4Mx0if4pRUkqctxEkIQCSyCjNg+t9xSgOdKQwrxVIlgeYHuG6XgENZAIaOGfq G5CBJYkIKakGxkPLXmXwqdqLMO/JXr+p5xr/ro0NF5oMj+dXZ22adbrdPnTPvEnLJp0+UHx4 U8X2UysTBCfy/V3uYfC8aD4H47etUYd1S/omBB+6uFfHa7FDnV2bg5lYUFTiqzKhhXarPR+z +V3S8vbobl0pPZ/RdKJZ6p/bsmrsBYq3bcK2fFoztXLCrfff5ymxFGckGmoxFxUnAgD4MekM TAMAAA==
Cc: "Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de" <Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de>, "Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de" <Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de>
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2013 10:10:58 -0000

Hi Mirko, Jose,

I also think that satellite specific scenario can wait to be discussed, focusing our efforts in the complete definition of the TCMTF itself. Regarding the discussion about the signaling for capabilities negotiation, it is being discussed in a different thread.

Regards,

Fernando Pascual Blanco
Telefónica Global Resources
Network Automation and Dynamization
TECHNOLOGY PEOPLE GROUP
F +34913128779
M +34682005168
fpb@tid.es

From: Mirko Sužnjević <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr<mailto:Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr>>
Date: miércoles, 9 de enero de 2013 11:21
To: "jsaldana@unizar.es<mailto:jsaldana@unizar.es>" <jsaldana@unizar.es<mailto:jsaldana@unizar.es>>, "tcmtf@ietf.org<mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>" <tcmtf@ietf.org<mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>>
Cc: "Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de<mailto:Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de>" <Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de<mailto:Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de>>, "Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de<mailto:Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de>" <Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de<mailto:Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de>>, Fernando Pascual Blanco <fpb@tid.es<mailto:fpb@tid.es>>
Subject: RE: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2

Well the satelite scenario is very interesting application of TCMTF, but I think that at this point we should focus our efforts on the current documents. Once we have the draft of the satellite scenario written and discussed we can include it in the new version of the Charter.
I think that the same applies to your first question regarding the specific draft about signaling issues. I think that the WG can be re-chartered later on.

Mirko Suznjevic

From: tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org> [mailto:tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jose Saldana
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 10:49 AM
To: tcmtf@ietf.org<mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
Cc: Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de<mailto:Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de>; Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de<mailto:Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de>; Fernando Pascual Blanco
Subject: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2

There is another question: Tomaso, from DLR, proposed another draft for a specific satellite scenario (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00095.html). Should we include this in the charter?

My opinion is that, at this stage, we could begin the WG without considering this, and at the same time a draft could be written and discussed. According to the ideas and feedback after that, including it in a new version of the Charter could be considered.

Jose


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email