[tcmtf] BoF preparation: Improvements in TCM-TF according to the received comments

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Wed, 05 February 2014 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95731A00F1; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:05:25 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.836
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.836 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_20=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id igcEnwnLHL3e; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:05:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: from isuela.unizar.es (isuela.unizar.es [155.210.1.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 74BD11A00EF; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:05:22 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by isuela.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s15C5J4g013014; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:05:19 +0100
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:05:24 +0100
Message-ID: <007101cf226a$8d4ff8e0$a7efeaa0$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0072_01CF2272.EF154B40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac8iaoBRyix1kdDRTtm12MWuQs1b5A==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org
Subject: [tcmtf] BoF preparation: Improvements in TCM-TF according to the received comments
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:05:25 -0000

Hi all,
 
In order to prepare the BoF in London, I have tried to summarize the
questions that have been discussed, in order to include the improvements in
the charter and in the two drafts.
 
On behalf of clarity, I will send different messages with the solutions for
each problem.
 
If you think there are other problems, please start a new thread.
 
 
Problems discussed in the BoF:
 
1) TCP multiplexing and effect on TCP dynamics. (I think this was the main
problem).
 
2) Path MTU discovery issues
 
3) Are we adding latency and complexity to save relatively little bandwidth?
 
4) Do vendors want standards in this space?
 
 
Problems discussed in the list:
 
5) Why is ROHC not a solution?
 
 
Jose