Re: [tcmtf] Deadlines for the different TCM-TF documents
Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> Tue, 30 July 2013 11:06 UTC
Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 3E93911E81CA for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:06:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.575
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.575 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.023,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id diWCV5Lq854Z for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:06:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mtv-iport-1.cisco.com (mtv-iport-1.cisco.com [173.36.130.12])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8276B11E810D for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:06:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com;
l=4891; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1375182364; x=1376391964;
h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc:message-id: references:to;
bh=lodJPeVl5ARzbjriq5kXhFTVmHkvWQ8zEgsfZHPvztE=;
b=jdgOhoEc7moQeafWbqc09JX9R0cmA4e7h061NWgWpN3jalSepF/MxRw8
jLfIu3U6ioTllrxSzf7bH+MiUFAw8gq+1xfSoN/GRadfGsZNA2BmArMzg
LoJI8XWKxKexvZC2Wj42D4pV8khrJnoitv5Pa5naVG6VD8sSoU2ORPE2s Y=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AgMFAP2c91GrRDoI/2dsb2JhbABbgkJENb5fgR0WdIIkAQEBAwEBAQFrCwULCw44JzAGE4gKBQ24fwSPegQHgxhvA5dfkUyDFjo
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos; i="4.89,777,1367971200"; d="scan'208,217";
a="84839542"
Received: from mtv-core-3.cisco.com ([171.68.58.8]) by mtv-iport-1.cisco.com
with ESMTP; 30 Jul 2013 11:06:03 +0000
Received: from sjc-vpn3-38.cisco.com (sjc-vpn3-38.cisco.com [10.21.64.38]) by
mtv-core-3.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r6UB62XQ011475;
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:06:02 GMT
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_020967AD-6372-4AD0-ADA5-F034C2B9DA18"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.5 \(1508\))
From: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <002801ce8d03$6f149040$4d3db0c0$@unizar.es>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:06:01 +0200
Message-Id: <21C48DB1-66DA-44E0-9A48-A60B5C1FF691@cisco.com>
References: <002801ce8d03$6f149040$4d3db0c0$@unizar.es>
To: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1508)
Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Deadlines for the different TCM-TF documents
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:06:27 -0000
Seems reasonable. -d On Jul 30, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote: > Hi all, > > Just a question for the BOF. Although in the presentation we are not talking about the deadlines, we should have something in mind. What about this? > > TCM-TF Reference Model: 9-12 months from the (eventual) creation of a WG > > TCM-TF Negotiation protocol: 18 months > > TCM-TF Recommendations: 12 months > > I would need your feedback. > > Thanks a lot! > > Jose > _______________________________________________ > tcmtf mailing list > tcmtf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf