IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2

Mirko Sužnjević <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr> Wed, 09 January 2013 10:21 UTC

Return-Path: <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A4CCF21F8644 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 02:21:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xVOaCHvO5cor for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 02:21:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail.zvne.fer.hr (mail.zvne.fer.hr [161.53.66.5]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 99FF121F8630 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 02:21:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from munja.zvne.fer.hr (161.53.66.248) by mail.zvne.fer.hr (161.53.66.5) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.2.318.4; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:21:31 +0100
Received: from sluga.fer.hr ([161.53.66.244]) by munja.zvne.fer.hr with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.4675); Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:21:19 +0100
x-mimeole: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-Class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----_=_NextPart_001_01CDEE53.106B205B"
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 11:21:16 +0100
Message-ID: <A3179A2C9AAEE647BE70AC4C7881D5FB01775E6A@sluga.fer.hr>
In-Reply-To: <008601cdee4e$7c69a310$753ce930$@unizar.es>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
Thread-Index: Ac3uTNeTbO+aCk7ITXS7wkpgZ6Gw0gABangw
References: <008601cdee4e$7c69a310$753ce930$@unizar.es>
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Mirko_Su=BEnjevi=E6?= <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr>
To: <jsaldana@unizar.es>, <tcmtf@ietf.org>
X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Jan 2013 10:21:19.0123 (UTC) FILETIME=[1090BE30:01CDEE53]
Cc: Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de, Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de, Fernando Pascual Blanco <fpb@tid.es>
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 10:21:34 -0000

Well the satelite scenario is very interesting application of TCMTF, but I think that at this point we should focus our efforts on the current documents. Once we have the draft of the satellite scenario written and discussed we can include it in the new version of the Charter. 

I think that the same applies to your first question regarding the specific draft about signaling issues. I think that the WG can be re-chartered later on.

 

Mirko Suznjevic

 

From: tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jose Saldana
Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 10:49 AM
To: tcmtf@ietf.org
Cc: Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de; Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de; Fernando Pascual Blanco
Subject: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2

 

There is another question: Tomaso, from DLR, proposed another draft for a specific satellite scenario (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00095.html). Should we include this in the charter?

 

My opinion is that, at this stage, we could begin the WG without considering this, and at the same time a draft could be written and discussed. According to the ideas and feedback after that, including it in a new version of the Charter could be considered.

 

Jose

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email