Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF
Manuel Gorius <gorius@nt.uni-saarland.de> Tue, 17 September 2013 00:21 UTC
Return-Path: <gorius@nt.uni-saarland.de>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FC0511E8168 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:21:38 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Qa7et-bMLT9h for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:21:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from triton.rz.uni-saarland.de (triton.rz.uni-saarland.de [134.96.7.25]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 54E8B11E8160 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Mon, 16 Sep 2013 17:21:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de (com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de [134.96.18.58]) by triton.rz.uni-saarland.de (8.14.1/8.14.0) with ESMTP id r8H0LD49032103; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:21:13 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD41D972001; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:21:13 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10032) with ESMTP id V0Q8asonb4WG; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:21:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8705B972002; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:21:10 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at intel-vci.uni-saarland.de
Received: from com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10026) with ESMTP id okyageT-bKPj; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:21:10 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by com.intel-vci.uni-saarland.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5096E972001; Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:21:10 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:21:10 +0200
From: Manuel Gorius <gorius@nt.uni-saarland.de>
To: jsaldana@unizar.es
Message-ID: <917683638.212231.1379377270245.JavaMail.zimbra@nt.uni-saarland.de>
In-Reply-To: <00ec01ceafbc$692c5ab0$3b851010$@unizar.es>
References: <017d01cead79$25240a10$6f6c1e30$@unizar.es> <AA275F59-30E3-4671-B1A5-3E808DC73EE0@nt.uni-saarland.de> <002d01ceae30$0e3460e0$2a9d22a0$@unizar.es> <EE48F51E-FFCF-4ADD-9C34-B4E131834844@nt.uni-saarland.de> <00ec01ceafbc$692c5ab0$3b851010$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Originating-IP: [192.55.60.72]
X-Mailer: Zimbra 8.0.4_GA_5739 (zclient/8.0.4_GA_5739)
Thread-Topic: Next steps with TCM-TF
Thread-Index: AQHuvPs5z3YNAt6hhH28PKho2tIgMgDdQFaPAxTcTRUBRZLleJlYOgnwsFl5IMk=
X-Greylist: Sender IP whitelisted, not delayed by milter-greylist-3.0 (triton.rz.uni-saarland.de [134.96.7.25]); Tue, 17 Sep 2013 02:21:14 +0200 (CEST)
X-AntiVirus: checked by AntiVir MailGate (version: 2.1.2-14; AVE: 7.9.10.68; VDF: 7.11.99.164; host: AntiVir3)
Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 17 Sep 2013 00:21:38 -0000
Hi Jose, Indeed the efficiency of the proposed error control scheme increases for higher data rates. I was assuming that the multiplexing of several flows would result in a reasonably high rate. The mechanisms deployed in our protocol, however, also scale down to lower rates. My idea after reading the notes taken during the BoF session was that this scheme could provide transparent error control on the multiplexed link segment so as to mitigate the impact of lost aggregated frames on ent-to-end error control of higher layers. I think delay-constrained error control is essential for those multiplexed flows. Simple, reactive packet repetitions might induce too much of unpredictable latency. Best regards, Manuel ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- Von: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> An: 'Manuel Gorius' <gorius@nt.uni-saarland.de> CC: tcmtf@ietf.org Gesendet: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:31:38 +0200 (CEST) Betreff: Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Hi, Manuel. I have been reading some of your papers. This is the idea I have got: - You have proposed and implemented a new transport protocol (Predictably Reliable Realtime Transport protocol, PRRT), which would be useful for providing the reliability required by multimedia services under their specific delay constraint. - It is "designed for high-rate and low-latency media services over lossy network infrastructures". - So the first use is video transmission, I think. Can some of the ideas be useful for TCM-TF? As a first question, TCM-TF can only optimize small-packet flows (VoIP, online games, sensor networks, M2M), which usually have low bandwidth requirements, and at the same time require low latency. So the considered services are not the same. You talk about "the question of transport reliability for such multiplexed packet flows". So, are you proposing the possibility of using some of these ideas for improving the reliability of multiplexed flows? Thanks! Jose De: Manuel Gorius [mailto:gorius@nt.uni-saarland.de] Enviado el: martes, 10 de septiembre de 2013 17:08 Para: jsaldana@unizar.es CC: tcmtf@ietf.org Asunto: Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose, Thank you for your interest. We had set up a project website providing literature and a Linux kernel module implementing our "Predictably Reliable Real-time Protocol": http://www.nt.uni-saarland.de/en/projects/running-projects/prrt.html For a quick technical overview I'd like to point you on a poster presentation available under: http://www.nt.uni-saarland.de/fileadmin/file_uploads/projects/prrt/PRRT_Post er.pdf Please let me know if any of the implemented ideas are suitable for the TCM-TF. Best regards, Manuel On 10.09.2013, at 16:14, "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote: Manuel, It sounds good. Could you please provide the link to some documentation (e.g. a paper, a report) about the "predictably reliable" error control scheme? Thanks! Jose De: Manuel Gorius [mailto:gorius@ <http://nt.uni-saarland.de> nt.uni-sa <http://nt.uni-saarland.de> arland.de] Enviado el: martes, 10 de septiembre de 2013 14:30 Para: <mailto:jsaldana@unizar.es> jsaldana@unizar.es CC: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org> tcmtf@ietf.org Asunto: Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Dear Jose, It was nice to follow the ideas brought up during the TCM-TF BoF. I think that a related standard might become important in near future since besides online gaming there is also a plenty of upcoming interactive and sensor applications that would be sending small parameter updates (think of smart factory applications for instance or even e-health services). I highly appreciate the decision to move the focus away from TCP. Given TCP's limited efficiency for interactive applications, the concerns of potential impact on its performance should not put an innovation bottleneck in front of new ideas improving transport efficiency. During the BoF session the question of transport reliability for such multiplexed packet flows was raised. This would be a point where our lab could contribute. We developed a "predictably reliable" error control scheme that operates under strict delay constraints. The scheme would particularly benefit from the larger packets and the higher aggregate data rate of the multiplexed packet flows. If such error control would be considered beneficial in TCM-TF, I'd be happy to become active. Best regards, Manuel Gorius On 09.09.2013, at 18:25, Jose Saldana < <mailto:jsaldana@unizar.es> jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote: Dear all, As you may know, we had a TCM-TF BoF in IETF87 Berlin ( <http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-tcmtf> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-tcmtf). As a result of the BoF, it was clear (IMHO) that there is some interest on the topic. There were a number of people who thought that a WG should be created, and several people also volunteered for reviewing documents. However, in the BoF it was also clear that there are some concerns that have to be issued before chartering. The main one is the interaction between TCM optimization and TCP mechanisms. Since TCP controls its rate depending on the RTT, the addition of a multiplexing delay may modify and even harm TCP behavior. As a consequence, we are going to redefine the Charter, removing the optimization of TCP. So RTP/UDP and UDP will be the considered options for optimization. We would like to get more people involved in the discussion, so we would like to invite those who actively participate on Transport Area discussion to join the mailing list <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf, in order to get their feedback. Thanks in advance, Jose Saldana _______________________________________________ tcmtf mailing list <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org> tcmtf@ietf.org <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf _______________________________________________ tcmtf mailing list <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org> tcmtf@ietf.org <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf
- [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF - TCP gorry
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius