[tcmtf] Three weeks for the deadline for requesting the BOF

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Mon, 27 May 2013 10:32 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5044021F8F1E for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:32:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=1.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id htcG5pnF6yq2 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:32:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es [155.210.1.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7575321F8EBC for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Mon, 27 May 2013 03:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r4RAW7BQ007312; Mon, 27 May 2013 12:32:07 +0200
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 12:32:13 +0200
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <00b701ce5ac5$7433ebe0$5c9bc3a0$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00B8_01CE5AD6.37BD7F30"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac5awCKwHR3Y9w17T9WwvgyOdq0A1A==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: spencer@wonderhamster.org, Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
Subject: [tcmtf] Three weeks for the deadline for requesting the BOF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 10:32:20 -0000

Hi all.

 

The cutoff date for sending the BOF proposal request is in three weeks (
<http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2013.html#IETF87>
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2013.html#IETF87).

 

According to  <http://www.ietf.org/iesg/bof-procedures.html>
http://www.ietf.org/iesg/bof-procedures.html, we need the next things:

 

1- full name of the BOF: Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows

 

 

2- acronym: TCMTF

 

 

3- suggested names of chairs: still pending

 

 

4- agenda: We have discussed it in other thread. I think it is complete with
the 5 presentations (
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00225.html>
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00225.html)

 

 

5- full description of the BOF: Is this the same as the Charter draft? (
<http://diec.unizar.es/~jsaldana/personal/ietf/tcmtf_charter_draft.pdf>
http://diec.unizar.es/~jsaldana/personal/ietf/tcmtf_charter_draft.pdf).
Otherwise we could prepare another text.

 

 

 

"The approval depends on, for instance, Internet-Drafts and list discussion
on the suggested topic."

 

We currently have two Internet-Drafts, and another one (Satellite scenarios)
may also be submitted (
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00095.html>
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00095.html)

 

 

 

I have also read again  <http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5434>
http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5434 in order to check if we are in the right
way, and I think so. We have been preparing this proposal from more than a
year ago (the first draft was presented in Paris in March 2012), and we have
a well-discussed charter draft (consensus was achieved in the list).

 

So we need to work a bit on 3 and 5.

 

Thanks a lot!

 

Jose