[tcmtf] TCMTF: Document C discussion: content and charter v2
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Tue, 22 January 2013 10:16 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 7909A21F85A4 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:16:32 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.561
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.561 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.038,
BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id iNUM9XEvMEHp for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:16:32 -0800 (PST)
Received: from isuela.unizar.es (isuela.unizar.es [155.210.1.53]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A702821F85AF for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Tue, 22 Jan 2013 02:16:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by
isuela.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r0MAGOEr014657 for
<tcmtf@ietf.org>; Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:16:24 +0100
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 11:16:35 +0100
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <00c801cdf889$8f091ec0$ad1b5c40$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Content-language: es
Thread-index: Ac34iYzLof1H6EEYSiCzJylEjVfVOQ==
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Subject: [tcmtf] TCMTF: Document C discussion: content and charter v2
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 22 Jan 2013 10:16:32 -0000
Here is the new version of the content of Document C Document (C) may refer to a new document about signaling 1.- Content of the Document #1. A *mechanism for a muxer to discover a de-muxer (and vice versa)*. We agree: This can be deployed in Document C. #2. A mechanism to *elect an optimal muxer and a de-muxer when there are more than one muxer/de-muxer for a flow*. We agree: This can be deployed in Document C. Fernando: #2 is more related to the higher entity that has to decide whether a flow should be TCMTFed or not, and under my point of view it can be addressed in a different draft. Muthu: #2 can be added later. 2.- Should we include it in the Charter now? I think we shouldnt include this in the charter as an objective. It can be included in one of the last paragraphs. Best regards, Jose
- [tcmtf] TCMTF: Document C discussion: content and… Jose Saldana