Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 3

["Jose Saldana" <[e-mail]>]

Hi, Luigi.

 

I get your point: perhaps we cannot mix LISP and TCMTF in draft (A).

 

However, since it seems that they can work together, and present some
synergies, we could think about a specific “experimental” draft. It could be
done within the LISP WG or within the TCMTF WG (if created). Perhaps it
would make more sense in the LISP WG.

 

However, I think this would have to wait a little. Before, we would need to:

 

- Better explore the synergies between LISP and TCMTF

- Have a clearer idea of TCMTF, I mean, move some steps towards the
standardization. By now, the “ugly truth” is that TCMTF is still a “personal
submission”

 

What do you think?

 

Jose

 

De: Luigi Iannone [mailto:[e-mail]] 
Enviado el: miércoles, 09 de enero de 2013 12:45
Para: [e-mail]
CC: [e-mail]; 'Joel M. Halpern'
Asunto: Re: Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 3

 

Hi,

 

obviously I am in favour of this ;-)

I think there are benefits is such solution.

 

Yet, if the WG is interested in this may be a different kind of document
should be added to the charter. 

 

Point 3 of the charter refers to "only standard protocols are being used"
and aims at a "best current practice" document. 

LISP is still considered "experimental", hence, I am not sure it can be
included in a BCP document. 

 

ciao

 

Luigi

 

On 9 Jan. 2013, at 10:47 , Jose Saldana <[e-mail]> wrote:





Another question: Luigi proposed the possibility of including LISP as
another possibility in the Tunneling layer (
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00073.html>
http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00073.html).

 

Should this be also somewhat included in the Charter?

 

Thanks,

 

Jose