[tcmtf] TCMTF: Document C discussion: content and charter

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Tue, 15 January 2013 10:56 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2850421F85E8 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:56:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XumskUnJuUWZ for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:56:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es [155.210.1.51]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0AF5421F8578 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:56:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r0FAuerI001885 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:56:40 +0100
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:56:42 +0100
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <008601cdf30f$0105f8c0$0311ea40$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0087_01CDF317.62CA60C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3zAaWdu17ID/aOR5mMJnwF9rLUGQ==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Subject: [tcmtf] TCMTF: Document C discussion: content and charter
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:56:44 -0000

Document (C) may refer to a new document about signaling

 

1.- Content of the Document

 

#2. A mechanism to *elect an optimal muxer and a de-muxer when there are
more than one muxer/de-muxer for a flow*.

 

We agree: This can wait for Document C.

 

                Fernando: "#2 is more related to the higher entity that has
to decide whether a flow should be TCMTFed or not, and under my point of
view it can be addressed in a different draft."

                Muthu: "#2 can be added later."

 

 

2.- Should we include it in the Charter now?

 

I think we shouldn't include this in the charter as an objective. It can be
included in one of the last paragraphs.

 

Best regards,

 

Jose