Re: [tcmtf] BoF proposal for Berlin. Possible scheme

[[e-mail]]

My guess is that many people at the IETF would "like" to see people say
they plan to implement for a product, or that they plan to devote
significant effort to seeing the standard matches their need for a
particular use case (e.g. operators or equipment vendors). This can be a
strong indication that there is a need for a standard.  This can be in a
slide, or at the Mic or on the list, slides, etc...

If it's just researchers wanting toi agree a spec that may also be OK, but
then it could be an IRTF activity that comes up with an experimental spec
for people to evaluate.

Gorry

> Hi, Mirko.
>
>
>
> The idea of energy savings is also interesting. People are getting more
> and
> more concerned with the energy consumption. Not only European Commission,
> but also smartphone and tablet manufacturers: the duration of the battery
> is
> critical there.
>
>
>
> For example, "Qualcomm has developed a solution called Network Socket
> Request Manager (NSRM) for efficient application management. NSRM reduces
> smart phone signaling traffic by bundling application requests and
> intelligently delaying them. NSRM provides significant signaling reduction
> and also improves stand-by time."
>
>
> <http://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/qualcomm-research-managing-backgrou
> nd-data-traffic-mobile-devices>
> http://www.qualcomm.com/media/documents/qualcomm-research-managing-backgroun
> d-data-traffic-mobile-devices
>
>
>
> Perhaps we could also include this idea in the presentations. The benefits
> of packet grouping are 3 instead of 2:
>
>
>
> 1- Bandwidth saving
>
> 2- PPS reduction
>
> 3- Energy savings
>
>
>
> What do you think? Will people at the IETF like energy savings?
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
>
>
> Jose
>
>
>
> De: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] En nombre de
> Mirko Su¾njevic
> Enviado el: martes, 14 de mayo de 2013 10:08
> Para: [e-mail]
> Asunto: Re: [tcmtf] BoF proposal for Berlin. Possible scheme
>
>
>
> Hello everybody,
>
> Well I concur with the structure. I believe that the main thing is to do
> is
> to well formulate and explain the problem. We must prove in a coherent way
> that the problem we are addressing here is a problem worth putting effort
> to
> and worth solving. In short we must present all the benefits the  solving
> of
> our problem might bring. We more or less covered the network aspects of
> the
> TCMTF. Maybe one of the previously not emphasized things is the notion of
> energy savings which TCMTF implementation might bring.  I am not certain
> would such topics be interesting in the IETF, but it was interesting for
> the
> European Commission.
>
> Ofcourse I will create the presentation regarding my part.
>
>
> Cheers!
>
> Mirko Suznjevic
>
>
>
>
>
> From: Jose Saldana [mailto:[e-mail]]
> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2013 12:25 PM
> To: [e-mail]
> Cc: Martin Stiemerling; Dan Wing; Mirko Su¾njeviæ
> Subject: BoF proposal for Berlin. Possible scheme
>
>
>
> Hi all.
>
>
>
> According to http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2013.html#IETF87,
> 2013-06-17 (Monday) is the cutoff date for BOF proposal requests to Area
> Directors. So we still have a month.
>
>
>
> we could discuss a bit the possible scheme for the BoF proposal.
>
>
>
> According to Martin's suggestion, we could begin the session with a teaser
> presentation describing what the exact issues are and what is the need for
> standardization.
>
>
>
> So we could follow this structure:
>
>
>
> 1- Teaser presentation: describing the problem and the need for
> standardization
>
>
>
> 2- Charter: Documents to be generated within this potential WG
>
>
>
> 3- Draft A: Explaining the current TCMTF proposal
>
>
>
> 4- Draft B: Explaining the content of the draft about delay requirements,
> classification methods, etc.
>
>
>
>
>
> Dan Wing could be in charge of (1). This would be good, since he is one of
> the authors of RFC4170 (the RFC we should "update" with TCMTF), so he
> knows
> the whole story. In addition, he has been in the TCMTF draft from the very
> beginning.
>
>
>
> I could be in charge of (2), mainly explaining the charter.
>
>
>
> Perhaps someone from Telefonica could be in charge of (3).
>
>
>
> Mirko Suznjevic could present (4), since he is the first author.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> What do you think? Any ideas?
>
>
>
> Thanks a lot and best regards!,
>
>
>
> Jose
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> tcmtf mailing list
> [e-mail]
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf
>