IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 1

"Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com> Wed, 09 January 2013 15:37 UTC

Return-Path: <dwing@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A1121F8831 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:37:41 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -110.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-110.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id C++BRtY+yz8s for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:37:40 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mtv-iport-2.cisco.com (mtv-iport-2.cisco.com [173.36.130.13]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C770621F8830 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:37:40 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=1036; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1357745860; x=1358955460; h=from:to:references:in-reply-to:subject:date:message-id: mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=fPIrfEd36gQS3EgWxcGx9ZVsdMeF4rK9bkRvy83SCTA=; b=UN1GhuKHVpj1JCij0duVt9twZUKD9whRPrAsFatpXGq5aNMVV7s3/o58 YZPhxDHkk/NBY9zkm9ut8s39vFtTrdkfqAuy1hHJPl4q3m4PA1gt1szJz 1FVMGQBmfbI6eO/0jFnyaqhufklM6riuYqavKkx4z7b8EILaXGD22mZPN M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlsIAP2N7VCrRDoJ/2dsb2JhbABEg0e6CxZzgh4BAQEDAQgCMDoKBwEDAgkRBAEBKAcZLQkIAgQBEgsFiAEFthyREAOIYYUdhFuDM5BJgxU
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,438,1355097600"; d="scan'208";a="68351808"
Received: from mtv-core-4.cisco.com ([171.68.58.9]) by mtv-iport-2.cisco.com with ESMTP; 09 Jan 2013 15:37:40 +0000
Received: from DWINGWS01 ([10.32.240.196]) by mtv-core-4.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r09FbegF001296; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 15:37:40 GMT
From: "Dan Wing" <dwing@cisco.com>
To: <jsaldana@unizar.es>, <tcmtf@ietf.org>
References: <007201cdee4e$61e4d960$25ae8c20$@unizar.es>
In-Reply-To: <007201cdee4e$61e4d960$25ae8c20$@unizar.es>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 07:37:40 -0800
Message-ID: <0b5901cdee7f$425a64d0$c70f2e70$@cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQDH7LepDP3BMXzcqEq1eyAG5/2DDJpNJL2A
Content-Language: en-us
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 1
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 15:37:41 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of Jose Saldana
> Sent: Wednesday, January 09, 2013 1:48 AM
> To: tcmtf@ietf.org
> Subject: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 1
> 
> One question is if we should consider the creation of a specific draft
> about signaling issues.

So, this is a 'problem statement', describing the problem we're trying
to solve (e.g., the application's tolerance for TCMTF-induced jitter)?  
Or, this is a document analyzing how we signal TCMTF capabilities to the 
other end?


> In paragraph 5, I have written the idea, but I
> don't currently know if it is necessary at this stage: "a mechanism to
> negotiate which concrete option would they use in each layer".
> 
> 
> 
> My opinion: We could first focus on drafts (A) and (B), and later re-
> charter the WG if necessary in order to consider this other document.

Agreed.

-d


> 
> 
> 
> What do you think?
> 
> 
> 
> Jose
> 
>

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email