IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF BOF proposal: outline of the session

Mirko Sužnjević <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr> Thu, 06 June 2013 09:45 UTC

Return-Path: <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0258F21F973A for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 02:45:51 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6xMjCNrZPudg for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 02:45:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.fer.hr (mail5.fer.hr [161.53.72.235]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75CE121F93B9 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 02:45:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from MAIL4.fer.hr ([2002:a135:48ea::a135:48ea]) by MAIL5.fer.hr ([2002:a135:48eb::a135:48eb]) with mapi id 14.02.0342.003; Thu, 6 Jun 2013 11:45:32 +0200
From: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Mirko_Su=BEnjevi=E6?= <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr>
To: "tcmtf@ietf.org" <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [tcmtf] TCMTF BOF proposal: outline of the session
Thread-Index: Ac5h11nCtybtZzlXTxaECdvitMM1KQAwvJtQ
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 09:45:31 +0000
Message-ID: <E004A7C54DE04F4BB87DB9F32308DA5C0BFFEE@MAIL4.fer.hr>
References: <004201ce61d8$3a1c81a0$ae5584e0$@unizar.es>
In-Reply-To: <004201ce61d8$3a1c81a0$ae5584e0$@unizar.es>
Accept-Language: en-US, hr-HR
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [161.53.19.114]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E004A7C54DE04F4BB87DB9F32308DA5C0BFFEEMAIL4ferhr_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] TCMTF BOF proposal: outline of the session
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 09:45:51 -0000

Hello,
I concur with this. It is important to make that discussion be the pinnacle of BoF. It should not be done before other stuff has been discussed, and before the people have had the chance to hear the presentations regarding the drafts!
Mirko

From: tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jose Saldana
Sent: Wednesday, June 5, 2013 12:34 PM
To: tcmtf@ietf.org
Cc: 'Spencer Dawkins'; Martin Stiemerling
Subject: [tcmtf] TCMTF BOF proposal: outline of the session

Hi all,

After a coordination conf-call we had yesterday, we think we could slightly modify the order of the presentations. The presentation of the WG charter should be the last one. The idea is that we should first explain what we want to do, and in the end we should summarize everything in the Charter. Otherwise people could start to discuss the charter in the beginning, and we can get stuck on that.


1- Teaser presentation: describing the problem and the need for standardization. Dan Wing, Cisco

2- Draft "TCMTF Stack": Explaining the current TCMTF proposal. Jose Saldana, University of Zaragoza

3- Draft "TCMTF Recommendations": Explaining the content of the draft about delay requirements, classification methods, etc. Mirko Suznjevic, University of Zagreb

(4-  Specific uses of TCMTF in wireless and satellite scenarios) To be confirmed by DLR

5- Charter: Documents to be generated within this potential WG. Diego R. Lopez, Telefonica



Any comments?

Best regards and thanks,

Jose

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email