[tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Wed, 09 January 2013 09:48 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 9F40721F8556 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Wed, 9 Jan 2013 01:48:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AfqDgnQzX3Dw for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Jan 2013 01:48:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from isuela.unizar.es (isuela.unizar.es [155.210.1.53]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF3A521F857A for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Wed, 9 Jan 2013 01:48:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by
isuela.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r099khFv022705;
Wed, 9 Jan 2013 10:48:27 +0100
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 9 Jan 2013 10:48:32 +0100
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <008601cdee4e$7c69a310$753ce930$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0087_01CDEE56.DE2E0B10"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3uTNeTbO+aCk7ITXS7wkpgZ6Gw0g==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de, Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de,
Fernando Pascual Blanco <fpb@tid.es>
Subject: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Jan 2013 09:48:34 -0000
There is another question: Tomaso, from DLR, proposed another draft for a specific satellite scenario (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00095.html). Should we include this in the charter? My opinion is that, at this stage, we could begin the WG without considering this, and at the same time a draft could be written and discussed. According to the ideas and feedback after that, including it in a new version of the Charter could be considered. Jose
- [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart pr… Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Char… Mirko Sužnjević
- Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Char… FERNANDO PASCUAL BLANCO
- Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Char… Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Char… Matteo.Berioli