Re: [tcmtf] Support to create the working group for TCM-TF

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Mon, 05 August 2013 18:24 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 86FB721F8FDC for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:24:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.913
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.913 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.686, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kuwCakJ2ZFlE for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vapor.isi.edu (vapor.isi.edu [128.9.64.64]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C143321F8F2E for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:24:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by vapor.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id r75IODJ4010311 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 5 Aug 2013 11:24:13 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <51FFEDCC.2090004@isi.edu>
Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 11:24:12 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>
References: <62cc435d$3efd1c1e$5089971$@fap-ntic.org> <51FBF33D.8000401@isi.edu> <51FC653A.8050206@mti-systems.com> <51FFE798.2030509@isi.edu> <51FFEABD.7080706@mti-systems.com>
In-Reply-To: <51FFEABD.7080706@mti-systems.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org, info@fap-ntic.org, martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Support to create the working group for TCM-TF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 05 Aug 2013 18:24:52 -0000

On 8/5/2013 11:11 AM, Wesley Eddy wrote:
> Joe - I think we should let the IESG do their job of determining
> if a charter is in scope for a particular area or needs to be
> shifted.

I don't think that should happen without open discussion.

> I trust that no matter what the area is, the same people who are
> interested in doing the work will stick around and get the work
> done.

Maybe, but historically that's exactly the reason the IESG gives to 
move items to particular areas.

Joe