[tcmtf] TCMTF: Document E discussion: content and charter
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Tue, 15 January 2013 10:57 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 9E2EC21F860A for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:57:29 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2R1w1Sdgpj4K for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:57:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es [155.210.1.51]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0124121F85BC for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:57:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by
huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r0FAvOfP002591 for
<tcmtf@ietf.org>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:57:24 +0100
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:57:27 +0100
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <009c01cdf30f$1b991a50$52cb4ef0$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_009D_01CDF317.7D5D8250"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3zAJryV5Ji6TcZRyiQIkx7FlKoAA==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Subject: [tcmtf] TCMTF: Document E discussion: content and charter
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:57:29 -0000
Document (E) may refer to a document about LISP and TCMTF 1.- Content of the Document It seems that LISP and TCMTF can work together, and present some synergies, we could think about a specific "experimental" draft. It could be done within the LISP WG or within the TCMTF WG (if created). Perhaps it would make more sense in the LISP WG. Luigi: "Well, it really depends on how the TCMTF evolves. However, you are right that there is no space for LISP in (A) and is worth to wait a little bit before going forward on this path." 2.- Should we include it in the Charter now? Clearly, we should not include it now. The problem is that LISP is experimental. I think this would have to wait a little. Before, we would need to: - Better explore the synergies between LISP and TCMTF - Have a clearer idea of TCMTF, I mean, move some steps towards the standardization. Best regards, Jose
- [tcmtf] TCMTF: Document E discussion: content and… Jose Saldana