[tcmtf] BoF proposal for Berlin. Possible scheme

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Mon, 13 May 2013 10:25 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7122C21F852D for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:25:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id OyDjIV9kLu6z for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:25:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4722F21F8E8F for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Mon, 13 May 2013 03:25:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r4DAOxxW028675; Mon, 13 May 2013 12:24:59 +0200
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 12:25:04 +0200
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <008201ce4fc4$22b8e510$682aaf30$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0083_01CE4FD4.E6425150"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac5PxBJaATCGYdMoQjike+GnlM5T4A==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: =?iso-8859-2?Q?Mirko_Su=BEnjevi=E6?= <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr>, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>, Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
Subject: [tcmtf] BoF proposal for Berlin. Possible scheme
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 13 May 2013 10:25:19 -0000

Hi all.

 

According to  <http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2013.html#IETF87>
http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2013.html#IETF87, 2013-06-17
(Monday) is the cutoff date for BOF proposal requests to Area Directors. So
we still have a month.

 

we could discuss a bit the possible scheme for the BoF proposal.

 

According to Martin's suggestion, we could begin the session with a teaser
presentation describing what the exact issues are and what is the need for
standardization.

 

So we could follow this structure:

 

1- Teaser presentation: describing the problem and the need for
standardization

 

2- Charter: Documents to be generated within this potential WG

 

3- Draft A: Explaining the current TCMTF proposal

 

4- Draft B: Explaining the content of the draft about delay requirements,
classification methods, etc.

 

 

Dan Wing could be in charge of (1). This would be good, since he is one of
the authors of RFC4170 (the RFC we should "update" with TCMTF), so he knows
the whole story. In addition, he has been in the TCMTF draft from the very
beginning.

 

I could be in charge of (2), mainly explaining the charter.

 

Perhaps someone from Telefonica could be in charge of (3).

 

Mirko Suznjevic could present (4), since he is the first author.

 

 

 

What do you think? Any ideas?

 

Thanks a lot and best regards!,

 

Jose