[tcmtf] Improvements in TCM-TF according to the received comments: Problem 1. TCP multiplexing

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Wed, 05 February 2014 12:05 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D9C41A0109; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:05:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id JbngpgvjRRwe; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:05:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from isuela.unizar.es (isuela.unizar.es [155.210.1.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A695D1A00EF; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:05:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by isuela.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s15C5fif013173; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:05:41 +0100
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:05:47 +0100
Message-ID: <007601cf226a$9a9d94d0$cfd8be70$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0077_01CF2272.FC62C020"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac8iZq73IXKzZY7hTtal/X7OvjkOfA==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org
Subject: [tcmtf] Improvements in TCM-TF according to the received comments: Problem 1. TCP multiplexing
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:05:47 -0000

Problem:
 
TCP multiplexing and effect on TCP dynamics. I think this was the main
problem.
 
[R. Peon]  This is not being done by a host; it is in network, if a
separator does not include timing, it could lose delay signals for
congestion control based on delay.
 
Solution:
This concern is related to TCP, and it no longer exist because TCP
multiplexing is not being considered.
 
 
Jose