Re: [tcmtf] Other potential specific uses of TCM-TF

Julián Fernández-Navajas <navajas@unizar.es> Thu, 20 June 2013 08:04 UTC

Return-Path: <navajas@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4A4AA21E80B0 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:04:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.298
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.298 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 1ynskrbU6vS3 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:04:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isuela.unizar.es (isuela.unizar.es [155.210.1.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A6A4C11E810E for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 01:04:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [155.210.156.37] (tele3.cps.unizar.es [155.210.156.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by isuela.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r5K84RUS026825 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT) for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:04:28 +0200
Message-ID: <51C2B780.5000302@unizar.es>
Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:04:16 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Juli=E1n_Fern=E1ndez-Navajas?= <navajas@unizar.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: tcmtf@ietf.org
References: <002801ce6cf9$500feac0$f02fc040$@unizar.es> <E6D8B95470ED0845B3376F61DCAB1A049CCE874D@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet> <005501ce6cfc$eb6e5d00$c24b1700$@unizar.es>
In-Reply-To: <005501ce6cfc$eb6e5d00$c24b1700$@unizar.es>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------000609050809060300010303"
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Other potential specific uses of TCM-TF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Jun 2013 08:04:49 -0000

Hi all,
I like to add a potencial new idea which could be addressed by 
re-chartering. What about the security on the tunnel?. It is possible to 
add security to TCMTF because it is inherent in the tunnels. And not 
only consider encryption, but also the digital signature which 
represents much loss of efficiency in the case of small packages.
Someone have more knowledge about this issue?
Julián

El 19/06/2013 16:54, Jose Saldana escribió:
> which could be addressed by re-chartering