Re: [tcmtf] TCM-TF and mobility

"Diego R. Lopez" <diego@tid.es> Thu, 18 July 2013 09:36 UTC

Return-Path: <diego@tid.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A481511E80E7 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:36:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.804
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.804 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.695, BAYES_05=-1.11, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zHb59qmiCcuI for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tidos.tid.es (tidos.tid.es [195.235.93.44]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAF9C11E8101 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 02:36:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbrightmailg01.hi.inet (sbrightmailg01.hi.inet [10.95.64.104]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MQ400D0SLCCQS@tid.hi.inet> for tcmtf@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:36:12 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from tid (tid.hi.inet [10.95.64.10]) by sbrightmailg01.hi.inet (Symantec Messaging Gateway) with SMTP id 20.3D.03142.B07B7E15; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:36:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from correo.tid.es (mailhost.hi.inet [10.95.64.100]) by tid.hi.inet (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 2.14 (built Aug 8 2006)) with ESMTP id <0MQ400D0OLCBQS@tid.hi.inet> for tcmtf@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:36:11 +0200 (MEST)
Received: from EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet ([169.254.2.38]) by EX10-HTCAS8-MAD.hi.inet ([fe80::41c8:e965:8a6:de67%11]) with mapi id 14.02.0328.009; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 11:36:11 +0200
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:36:11 +0000
From: "Diego R. Lopez" <diego@tid.es>
In-reply-to: <001c01ce78ce$10ba6450$322f2cf0$@unizar.es>
X-Originating-IP: [10.95.64.115]
To: "<jsaldana@unizar.es>" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Message-id: <E6D8B95470ED0845B3376F61DCAB1A049CD1F357@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_T2YzYNEQyLjsLx2NHJkQ7g)"
Content-language: en-US
Accept-Language: en-US, es-ES
Thread-topic: [tcmtf] TCM-TF and mobility
Thread-index: Ac54yD46kc6esDuLRW2yf9vSBPgA9gKwTlUA
X-AuditID: 0a5f4068-b7f128e000000c46-d4-51e7b70b76d8
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
X-Brightmail-Tracker: H4sIAAAAAAAAA+NgFprEIsWRmVeSWpSXmKPExsXCFe/Apcuz/XmgwbW1rBa7Pm9gdGD0WLLk J1MAYxSXTUpqTmZZapG+XQJXxpXra1gKNs5lrLj+/ixjA+O7LsYuRk4OCQETielXl7FB2GIS F+6tB7K5OIQENjJKPLwxlwXC+cEo8fPZRkYIZwOjRM+zOewgLSwCqhKX3jUwgdhsQPaj5t9g cWEBDYnv916BjeUUsJBouHmSCWKFgsSfc49ZQGwRAX2JG48h6pkF4iVWvHjKCmLzCnhLfF9y lBnCFpT4MfkeUD0HUE2uxMLGcIhycYnm1ptgYxgFZCXezZ/PCjFSU2J10xQ2CNtI4vT071Bf Ckgs2XOeGcIWlXj5+B8ryEghAXOJvRd0JjCKzUKybBbCsllIlkHYBhLvz81nhrC1JZYtfA1l 60ts/HKWEcI2k/hxdjkLspoFjByrGMWKk4oy0zNKchMzc9INDPUyMvUy81JLNjFC4jFjB+Py nSqHGAU4GJV4eG/wPA8UYk0sK67MPcQowcGsJMJbbgYU4k1JrKxKLcqPLyrNSS0+xMjEwSnV wMgxpdJnbvDKyb7Kz9zXli87vYrLUfL1TrOWAvbsh+UvfCZZS4b2rOeLubOfoTpsg4P2U5fr st473VfqrWDWmFf8faa91Qkpj9O3okKaBJ722J02O8IWvnDd3Yktsuc+tq9tmVn27eKXlw/U 2YpKWaf8f3hNpWftu2qW39lebZXVZ+0DHuypyFBiKc5INNRiLipOBACHYXwOpQIAAA==
References: <001c01ce78ce$10ba6450$322f2cf0$@unizar.es>
Cc: "<tcmtf@ietf.org>" <tcmtf@ietf.org>, =?Windows-1252?Q?Jos=E9_Ruiz_Mas?= <jruiz@unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] TCM-TF and mobility
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 09:36:20 -0000

Hi,

Getting to this after another discussion on LISP and TCM-TF, let me say that TCM can benefit mobility-enhancing protocols the same way it can benefit security protocols (as we have discussed with the IPsec case) and possibly any other tunneling-based techniques. Grouping flows and optimizing their transport translates into more efficient tunneling. It is true we are not talking here about fast hand-over mobility, but of the case of roaming users, but anyway it is a relevant portion of mobility use cases.

Be goode,

On 4 Jul 2013, at 17:49 , Jose Saldana wrote:

Hi all.

We are discussing a lot about security and TCM-TF. Why not talking a bit about TCM-TF and mobility?

A) First question: How can user mobility and TCM-TF affect each other?

1- Residential scenario: I am a network operator, and I am TCM-optimizing a number of real-time (VoIP, online games) flows which are present in my access network. What happens if one of the users moves to another location? Is there any difference between the case in which the traffic is TCM-optimized and the non-TCM case?

In a first approach, I don’t think so. TCM is applied in a network segment. The end hosts may not even notice that TCM is being used. It would be seen as an additional network delay and jitter. Thus, if the user moves and a flow disappears, nothing happens to the rest of the flows. And regarding the flow of the mobile user, it will be managed by the mobility protocol in the same way.


2-Corporate environment: I am using two network appliances in order to create a VPN between two offices of my company. There is a TCM session between the two appliances, optimizing a number of VoIP calls. If a user gets out of the office and his/her VoIP call moves to a 3G data connection, what happens? Is there any difference with respect to the non-TCM case?

I think the answer is the same as in 1.


3- Machine to machine scenario (sensors, industrial control): Does mobility exist here? Any ideas?


B) Second question: Can any mobility protocol take advantage of TCM-TF?

Just an idea (suggested by Jose Ruiz) regarding *PMIPv6* (RFC5213, http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5213):

This network-based mobility protocol creates a tunnel between the LMA (similar to the HA in MIPv6) and the MAG (typically runs on the access router).

This *tunnel is shared by all the flows* between the LMA and the MAG:
“the bidirectional tunnel between the LMA and MAG is typically a shared tunnel, and can be employed for routing traffic streams for different MNs attached to the same MAG. It extends the 1:1 relation between a tunnel and an MN’s binding cache entry to a 1:m relation, reflecting the shared nature of the tunnel” [1]. The tunnel between LMA and MAG can be based on GRE or IP-in-IP.

So we have a tunnel shared by a number of flows. Why not optimizing that traffic? Instead of a tunnel including lots of small packets, can we multiplex them and compress headers? Are these bandwidth and pps reductions interesting?


Thanks,

Jose

[1]  Ki-Sik Kong; Wonjun Lee; Youn-Hee Han; Myung-Ki Shin; HeungRyeol You, "Mobility management for all-IP mobile networks: mobile IPv6 vs. proxy mobile IPv6," Wireless Communications, IEEE , vol.15, no.2, pp.36,45, April 2008
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=4492976&isnumber=4492967
http://voiplab.niu.edu.tw/ppt/ipv6/R9843011.pdf

More info:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proxy_Mobile_IPv6
http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios-xml/ios/mob_pmipv6/configuration/xe-3s/deployment/Proxy_Mobile_IPv6_Network-Based_Mobility.html
_______________________________________________
tcmtf mailing list
tcmtf@ietf.org<mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf


--
"Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno"

Dr Diego R. Lopez
Telefonica I+D
http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/

e-mail: diego@tid.es
Tel:    +34 913 129 041
Mobile: +34 682 051 091
-----------------------------------------


________________________________

Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo.
This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at:
http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx