[tcmtf] Improvements in TCM-TF according to the received comments: Problem 2: Path MTU
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Wed, 05 February 2014 12:06 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3D2251A0105; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:06:04 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.735
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.735 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.535, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ig0LDUGTThnu; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:06:02 -0800 (PST)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EC4B51A00F1; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 04:06:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s15C5sC5010816; Wed, 5 Feb 2014 13:05:54 +0100
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: tcmtf@ietf.org
Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 13:06:02 +0100
Message-ID: <007b01cf226a$a41cc3a0$ec564ae0$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_007C_01CF2273.05E1EEF0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac8iZu8bs/A5hOnDQCKAsNw68kGXIQ==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: tsv-area@ietf.org
Subject: [tcmtf] Improvements in TCM-TF according to the received comments: Problem 2: Path MTU
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2014 12:06:04 -0000
Problem: Gorry: Perhaps we should also look at PMTU issues? Al: Yes. The operations considerations should be thought about. Solution: (see this thread: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00422.html> http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00422.html) The current charter talks about MTU in number 7. Jose
- [tcmtf] Improvements in TCM-TF according to the r… Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Improvements in TCM-TF according to t… Luigi Iannone
- Re: [tcmtf] Improvements in TCM-TF according to t… Jose Saldana