Re: [tcmtf] Interesting results of the combination of LISP and TCMTF
Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net> Fri, 01 March 2013 11:09 UTC
Return-Path: <ggx@gigix.net>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id D2BAF21F8A3F for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 1 Mar 2013 03:09:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.248
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.248 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001,
RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 7SA0K1IgVmy0 for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 03:09:30 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com (mail-wg0-f53.google.com
[74.125.82.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3B38E21F8A25 for
<tcmtf@ietf.org>; Fri, 1 Mar 2013 03:09:28 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id fn15so2340965wgb.20 for
<tcmtf@ietf.org>; Fri, 01 Mar 2013 03:09:27 -0800 (PST)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com;
s=20120113;
h=x-received:content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
:cc:message-id:references:to:x-mailer:x-gm-message-state;
bh=FwJa+p0pfHn4wsF3TTpeabDm877xUNP9h83sU+cyZWE=;
b=fnihVF9TAbfmm3KAqBWlwE+qkgEN/09geX1ri5iOXfNkfS3zE+G/kFwqrlEULd0pxu
cYBzOfk608cT6dKXOrQ4nGbtAh+do9Bm+4x32E3IX08GZLgaEZH5E0T9PCvl4IdliDpj
PUIAs1AIHG9yUymtvJ+0xWOG7DC5y391XrrwgjChvK765NpoRbT32P7Gpbe9f2AVDbzE
AFOPaNrCnTKKIlDLN6rypXfXCp8kyrAM6ZbscOD1lr/M5mZ3omhIXWauq6nEKfK13E3L
Z2C+dvQZ8lGFWGf+hw476M5eku2XjpZy/VQPRc7l4Gu/WE2FvF82o2ckdY1Q2R6JZv0o g1+w==
X-Received: by 10.180.98.232 with SMTP id el8mr10814503wib.22.1362136167206;
Fri, 01 Mar 2013 03:09:27 -0800 (PST)
Received: from dhcp164-03.enst.fr (dhcp164-03.enst.fr. [137.194.165.3]) by
mx.google.com with ESMTPS id t7sm38740378wiy.2.2013.03.01.03.09.25
(version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128);
Fri, 01 Mar 2013 03:09:25 -0800 (PST)
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="Apple-Mail=_2CDE0D23-05C5-4EF8-B0E3-251956C5AE47"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 6.2 \(1499\))
From: Luigi Iannone <ggx@gigix.net>
In-Reply-To: <007201ce15a1$23a92a50$6afb7ef0$@unizar.es>
Date: Fri, 1 Mar 2013 12:09:24 +0100
Message-Id: <3F171D0E-91F5-4DEE-A46F-9B6B9166EE32@gigix.net>
References: <007201ce15a1$23a92a50$6afb7ef0$@unizar.es>
To: jsaldana@unizar.es
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1499)
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQk/En7pgpBoRsbZtJJpGR/5PrGOsVmZitt/rcZdz5SxPDG2kfUAZZOehH6glh26n1j3zh4F
Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org, lisp@ietf.org,
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Juli=E1n_Fern=E1ndez_Navajas?= <navajas@unizar.es>,
=?iso-8859-1?Q?Jos=E9_Ruiz_Mas?= <jruiz@unizar.es>,
DIEGO LOPEZ GARCIA <diego@tid.es>,
Luigi Iannone <luigi.iannone@telecom-paristech.fr>
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Interesting results of the combination of LISP and TCMTF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 01 Mar 2013 11:09:31 -0000
Hi, On 28 Feb. 2013, at 11:48 , Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote: [snip] > > We have also studied the ability of the LISP framework to manage the signaling of TCMTF options. > As a quick addition, it is worth noting that no changes are requested to LISP protocol in anyway. The signalling aspects consist in just using LCAF and take advantage of the deployed mapping system. In practice it is possible to use LCAF to encode the multiplexing and compression information in a mapping. Once installed in the LISP Cache that mapping would just indicate to the ITR to perform TCMTF operations before lisp-encapsulating, while on the ETR would indicate to perform TCMTF operation after decapsulation. ciao Luigi > We think these results are interesting, so we wanted to share them here. Feel free to read the paper and discuss about it. > > Thanks a lot, > > Jose Saldana > > _______________________________________________ > tcmtf mailing list > tcmtf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf
- [tcmtf] Interesting results of the combination of… Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Interesting results of the combinatio… Luigi Iannone