[tcmtf] Where to talk about security

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Mon, 01 July 2013 11:26 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2118621F9E3B for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 04:26:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id H0zX1DHsfyeq for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 04:26:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 203C021F9DF7 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 04:26:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r61BQWEc008086 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:26:37 +0200
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 1 Jul 2013 13:26:36 +0200
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <014b01ce764d$dbdcc0c0$93964240$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_014C_01CE765E.9F6590C0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac5wrz13IWZxxTaCQH6g7L6OvBjX3A==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Subject: [tcmtf] Where to talk about security
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 01 Jul 2013 11:26:48 -0000

Hi all.

 

In the "TCM-TF reference model" (
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf/>
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf/) we say nothing
in the "security" section. I am preparing an updated version.

 

We could perhaps talk about the use of security tunnels (perhaps IPSEC) as
the most straightforward solution for providing end-to-end security to the
optimized tunnel. What do you think?

 

Jose