[tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Mon, 09 September 2013 16:29 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 3ED6321F9FB4; Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:29:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.184
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.184 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_40=-0.185, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id NoTX0U+b1RYk;
Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:29:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A36D11E81D5;
Mon, 9 Sep 2013 09:25:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by
ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r89GP1ti029827;
Mon, 9 Sep 2013 18:25:02 +0200
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tsv-area@ietf.org>
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2013 18:25:06 +0200
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <017d01cead79$25240a10$6f6c1e30$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_017E_01CEAD89.E8AD4F40"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac6teNUjCVdlbaMvQiCt9zW76pnh/w==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org
Subject: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 16:29:11 -0000
Dear all, As you may know, we had a TCM-TF BoF in IETF87 Berlin ( <http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-tcmtf> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-tcmtf). As a result of the BoF, it was clear (IMHO) that there is some interest on the topic. There were a number of people who thought that a WG should be created, and several people also volunteered for reviewing documents. However, in the BoF it was also clear that there are some concerns that have to be issued before chartering. The main one is the interaction between TCM optimization and TCP mechanisms. Since TCP controls its rate depending on the RTT, the addition of a multiplexing delay may modify and even harm TCP behavior. As a consequence, we are going to redefine the Charter, removing the optimization of TCP. So RTP/UDP and UDP will be the considered options for optimization. We would like to get more people involved in the discussion, so we would like to invite those who actively participate on Transport Area discussion to join the mailing list <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf, in order to get their feedback. Thanks in advance, Jose Saldana
- [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF - TCP gorry
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Next steps with TCM-TF Manuel Gorius