Re: [tcmtf] Three weeks for the deadline for requesting the BOF

Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu> Wed, 29 May 2013 08:09 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4FA21F9193 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 01:09:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.514
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.514 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.085, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id UKhjJbUZyQzW for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 29 May 2013 01:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu (mailer1.neclab.eu [195.37.70.40]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5872F21F9180 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Wed, 29 May 2013 01:09:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id E41E5103C13; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:09:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (netlab.nec.de)
Received: from mailer1.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas-a.office.hd [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id LMnONqnM74TI; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:09:01 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from ENCELADUS.office.hd (enceladus.office.hd [192.168.24.52]) by mailer1.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id CBFDE1041E6; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:08:46 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [10.1.1.190] (10.1.1.190) by skoll.office.hd (192.168.125.11) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.1.323.3; Wed, 29 May 2013 10:07:56 +0200
Message-ID: <51A5B781.2060806@neclab.eu>
Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 10:08:33 +0200
From: Martin Stiemerling <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130510 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: <jsaldana@unizar.es>, <tcmtf@ietf.org>
References: <00b701ce5ac5$7433ebe0$5c9bc3a0$@unizar.es>
In-Reply-To: <00b701ce5ac5$7433ebe0$5c9bc3a0$@unizar.es>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Originating-IP: [10.1.1.190]
Cc: spencer@wonderhamster.org
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Three weeks for the deadline for requesting the BOF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 May 2013 08:09:15 -0000

Jose, all,


On 05/27/2013 12:32 PM, Jose Saldana wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> The cutoff date for sending the BOF proposal request is in three
> weeks (http://www.ietf.org/meeting/cutoff-dates-2013.html#IETF87).
>
> According to http://www.ietf.org/iesg/bof-procedures.html, we need
> the next things:
>
> 1-full name of the BOF: Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic
> Flows
>
> 2- acronym: TCMTF
>
> 3- suggested names of chairs: still pending

The ADs will name the BoF chairs but we are open to any suggestion.

>
> 4- agenda: We have discussed it in other thread. I think it is
> complete with the 5 presentations
> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00225.html)
>
> 5- full description of the BOF: Is this the same as the Charter
> draft?
> (http://diec.unizar.es/~jsaldana/personal/ietf/tcmtf_charter_draft.pdf).
>  Otherwise we could prepare another text.

The charter text should be ok, or put in other words: It is bad sign if 
the charter text isn't capturing this :)

>
> “The approval depends on, for instance, Internet-Drafts and list
> discussion on the suggested topic.”
>
> We currently have two Internet-Drafts, and another one (Satellite
> scenarios) may also be submitted
> (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00095.html)
>
> I have also read again http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5434in order to
>  check if we are in the right way, and I think so. We have been
> preparing this proposal from more than a year ago (the first draft
> was presented in Paris in March 2012), and we have a well-discussed
> charter draft (consensus was achieved in the list).
>
> So we need to work a bit on 3 and 5.

For me it looks ok to go for BoF, but this will be eventually discussed 
by the whole IESG in June.

Thanks and keep going!

   Martin

-- 
martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe
NEC Europe Limited
Registered Office:
Athene, Odyssey Business Park, West End  Road, London, HA4 6QE, GB
Registered in England 2832014