IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF proposal

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Fri, 31 May 2013 07:54 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C9A2121F93E0 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:54:28 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.319
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.319 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.280, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id d45sk3sKMwFI for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:54:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from isuela.unizar.es (isuela.unizar.es [155.210.1.53]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82B921F9371 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Fri, 31 May 2013 00:54:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by isuela.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r4V7sFXH022042; Fri, 31 May 2013 09:54:16 +0200
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: "'Gonzalo Camarillo'" <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>, "'Martin Stiemerling'" <martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu>
References: <00bc01ce5ac5$862f0a50$928d1ef0$@unizar.es> <51A5B7FA.9050609@neclab.eu> <51A6FA34.9030804@ericsson.com>
In-Reply-To: <51A6FA34.9030804@ericsson.com>
Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 09:54:25 +0200
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <009301ce5dd4$12ccbaa0$38662fe0$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQK/TPif+MSfdcRmgf28FgbHCH6EfQKn+3m0AIc+QiSXI5PmMA==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org, spencer@wonderhamster.org
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF proposal
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 31 May 2013 07:54:28 -0000

And we should also avoid conflict with MPLS. It is included as an option for
the "tunneling" layer.

Jose

> -----Mensaje original-----
> De: tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org] En nombre de
> Gonzalo Camarillo
> Enviado el: jueves, 30 de mayo de 2013 9:05
> Para: Martin Stiemerling
> CC: tcmtf@ietf.org; spencer@wonderhamster.org; jsaldana@unizar.es
> Asunto: Re: [tcmtf] Other questions necessary for the BOF proposal
> 
> Hi,
> 
> > All Transport Area WGs sounds like a good idea. It would be good to
> > double check what WGs out of RAI should be on the conflict list.
> 
> in addition to Dan's suggestions, I would add MMUSIC as well.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Gonzalo
> _______________________________________________
> tcmtf mailing list
> tcmtf@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf

v2.8.7 | Report a Bug | By Email