Re: [tcmtf] Deadlines for the different TCM-TF documents - off list
Gorry <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk> Tue, 30 July 2013 11:18 UTC
Return-Path: <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 9788B11E814F for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:18:14 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.725
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No,
score=-105.725 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.524, BAYES_00=-2.599,
HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4,
USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id SNCvC7FSwTMt for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk [139.133.204.173]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F1721F9EC2 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 04:18:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix, from userid 5001) id 9A7492B44D7;
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:18:08 +0100 (BST)
Received: from [130.129.23.225] (dhcp-17e1.meeting.ietf.org [130.129.23.225])
by spey.erg.abdn.ac.uk (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 256E72B4096;
Tue, 30 Jul 2013 12:18:03 +0100 (BST)
References: <002801ce8d03$6f149040$4d3db0c0$@unizar.es>
<21C48DB1-66DA-44E0-9A48-A60B5C1FF691@cisco.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
In-Reply-To: <21C48DB1-66DA-44E0-9A48-A60B5C1FF691@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary=Apple-Mail-64DDA076-1727-44F0-9242-0396F5BC27E4
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <269D7A4D-A172-4326-A225-79C83F149A2B@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
X-Mailer: iPad Mail (10B329)
From: Gorry <gorry@erg.abdn.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 13:18:04 +0200
To: Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com>
Cc: "tcmtf@ietf.org" <tcmtf@ietf.org>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Deadlines for the different TCM-TF documents - off list
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Jul 2013 11:18:14 -0000
I think this seems reasonable. Lets see what people say! Gorry On 30 Jul 2013, at 01:06 PM, Dan Wing <dwing@cisco.com> wrote: > Seems reasonable. > > -d > > On Jul 30, 2013, at 11:01 AM, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Just a question for the BOF. Although in the presentation we are not talking about the deadlines, we should have something in mind. What about this? >> >> TCM-TF Reference Model: 9-12 months from the (eventual) creation of a WG >> >> TCM-TF Negotiation protocol: 18 months >> >> TCM-TF Recommendations: 12 months >> >> I would need your feedback. >> >> Thanks a lot! >> >> Jose >> _______________________________________________ >> tcmtf mailing list >> tcmtf@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf > > _______________________________________________ > tcmtf mailing list > tcmtf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf