[tcmtf] Showing the interest of the Industry on TCMTF
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Fri, 17 May 2013 08:14 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id BB91821F8411 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 17 May 2013 01:14:03 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.356
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.356 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.242,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nwHrYcL-ZiEw for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 17 May 2013 01:13:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A965021F8AF4 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Fri, 17 May 2013 01:13:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by
ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r4H8Dp6g029907 for
<tcmtf@ietf.org>; Fri, 17 May 2013 10:13:51 +0200
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 10:13:59 +0200
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <00d601ce52d6$7bd5a100$7380e300$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00D7_01CE52E7.3F5EE630"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac5S1lWzcyqRiylAQWmSzwDvpDBjpg==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Subject: [tcmtf] Showing the interest of the Industry on TCMTF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 17 May 2013 08:14:04 -0000
Hi all, Gorry raised this question: we have to show the interest of the Industry on the standardization of TCMTF. Some Cisco devices implement similar (proprietary) multiplexing schemes, mainly with the idea of saving pps in VoIP for pps-constrained links (e.g. satellites): http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/gov/data_sheet_c78-697643_v1.pdf http://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/gov/aag_c45-697642_v2.pdf So an IETF standard would be interesting for - interoperating with other manufacturers' devices. - defining a standard way for multiplexing non-RTP flows Best regards, Jose