Re: [tcmtf] Improvements in the TCM-TF charter draft v8

["Eggert, Lars" <[e-mail]>]

Hi,

why is ROHC not a solution?

Lars

On 2013-11-20, at 6:13, Jose Saldana <[e-mail]> wrote:

> Hi all.
> 
> We have the idea of asking for a BoF in London in March 2014. For this aim,
> we should discuss a new version of the charter draft. I send it in the next
> e-mail.
> 
> This e-mail summarizes the improvements. I have put different numbers, in
> order to discuss them separately in the list.
> 
> 1- In order to be consistent with the drafts, the charter should talk about
> "TCM-ingress and egress optimizers" instead of "TCM multiplexers and
> demultiplexers".
> 
> 2- A new scenario has been included "a wireless Internet connection shared
> by a number of people in a place with low Internet penetration", taking into
> account that some people from Africa were interested on TCM for improving
> real-time applications in this kind of places.
> 
> 3- Scenario: "a community network, in which a number of people in the same
> geographical place share their connections in a cooperative way". It has
> some similarities with the previous one.
> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Community_network. 
> 
> 4- Scenario: "a satellite connection used for providing connectivity in a
> non-connected area during a short period of time (e.g. journalists covering
> the arrival of a mountain stage of a cycling competition)."
> 
> 5- Scenario: " -	an air-to-ground connection providing Internet
> connectivity to the passengers of an aircraft, multiplexing a number of
> simultaneous VoIP flows. The same can be applied between a cruise ship and a
> satellite." http://www.gogoair.com/gogo/cms/work.do
> 
> 6- According to the feedback received in the BoF in Berlin, the references
> to TCP have been removed.
> 
> 7- A reference to the potential problem of the MTU and packet loss has been
> added in number 8: "The eventual impact of multiplexing on protocol dynamics
> (e.g. the lost of a multiplexed packet, MTU-related issues) will also have
> to be addressed.."
> 
> 
> Any other suggestions, according to what we discussed in the BoF?
> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/87/minutes/minutes-87-tcmtf
> 
> 
> Best regards,
> 
> Jose Saldana
>