Re: [tcmtf] [tsvwg] New version (v7) of TCM-TF draft

Julián Fernández-Navajas <navajas@unizar.es> Tue, 10 June 2014 11:02 UTC

Return-Path: <navajas@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB7B41A0535; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:02:07 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_8BIT_HEADER=0.3, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 9M1OA3upAZpK; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:02:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huecha.unizar.es (huecha.unizar.es [155.210.1.51]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E7C281A050E; Tue, 10 Jun 2014 04:02:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (tele3.cps.unizar.es [155.210.156.37]) (authenticated bits=0) by huecha.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id s5AB1xHv020719 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:01:59 +0200
Message-ID: <5396E5A4.6090508@unizar.es>
Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 13:01:56 +0200
From: =?ISO-8859-15?Q?Juli=E1n_Fern=E1ndez-Navajas?= <navajas@unizar.es>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Eggert, Lars" <lars@netapp.com>, Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
References: <014d01cf8487$62adea50$2809bef0$@unizar.es> <2066ADBD-A397-4A34-AC40-4413347DB6B3@netapp.com>
In-Reply-To: <2066ADBD-A397-4A34-AC40-4413347DB6B3@netapp.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------030909020708070809010902"
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcmtf/xvGdQlvlJdTbujel1eNMljRThUU
Cc: "tcmtf@ietf.org" <tcmtf@ietf.org>, Martin Stiemerling <mls.ietf@gmail.com>, "tsv-area@ietf.org" <tsv-area@ietf.org>, "tsvwg@ietf.org" <tsvwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] [tsvwg] New version (v7) of TCM-TF draft
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jun 2014 11:02:08 -0000

Hello Lars,

I send you some publications that quantify the benefits (in terms of 
bandwidth) and drawbacks (in terms of latency and loss).

VoIP: this paper evaluates the bandwidth savings and also the influence 
of multiplexing on VoIP subjective quality (using ITU's E-Model):

/"Evaluating the Influence of Multiplexing Schemes and Buffer 
Implementation on Perceived VoIP Conversation Quality 
<http://diec.unizar.es/%7Ejsaldana/personal/computer_networks_2012_in_proc.pdf>,"/Computer 
Networks 
<http://www.journals.elsevier.com/computer-networks/>(Elsevier), Volume 
56, Issue 7, Pages 1893-1919, May2012.doi 
<http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.02.004>__10.1016/j.comnet.2012.02.004

<http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.02.004>

Online games: This paper also calculates bandwidth 
savings:<http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.02.004>

/_First Person Shooters: Can a Smarter Network Save Bandwidth without 
Annoying the Players?_,"IEEE Communications Magazine,vol. 49, no.11, pp. 
190-198,November 2011. 
doi:_10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069728_<http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.comnet.2012.02.004>/

<http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069728>

And this one is focused on the effect on subjective quality (using a 
subjective quality estimator for a FPS 
game):<http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069728>

/"Online FPS Games: Effect of Router Buffer and Multiplexing Techniques 
on Subjective Quality Estimators,"_Multimedia Tools and Applications_, 
Springer._doi__10.1007/s11042-012-1309-4_<http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/MCOM.2011.6069728>/

<http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11042-012-1309-4>

Regards

Julián


  El 10/06/2014 10:59, Eggert, Lars escribió:
> Hi,
>
> are there any measurements or simulations that would quantify the benefits (in terms of bandwidth) and drawbacks (in terms of latency)?
>
> Lars