[tcmtf] TCMTF: Summary of the discussion about the Charter for a possible Working Group
"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Tue, 15 January 2013 10:55 UTC
Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id C359E21F860A for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:55:39 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.000,
BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bPnZB1DGK-V7 for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:55:38 -0800 (PST)
Received: from isuela.unizar.es (isuela.unizar.es [155.210.1.53]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4494021F85E8 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 02:55:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by
isuela.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r0FAtTK4000661;
Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:55:29 +0100
From: "Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: <tcmtf@ietf.org>
Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 11:55:34 +0100
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <006501cdf30e$d890ea80$89b2bf80$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0066_01CDF317.3A555280"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: Ac3y/UFqIyjasnoeRoy+0n+IH96/pA==
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Cc: Wesley Eddy <wes@mti-systems.com>,
Gonzalo Camarillo <Gonzalo.Camarillo@ericsson.com>,
Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
Subject: [tcmtf] TCMTF: Summary of the discussion about the Charter for a
possible Working Group
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 10:55:39 -0000
Hi all. Last week we discussed about the charter and the drafts to include in a possible Working Group about TCMTF. In this mail, I will try to summarize the discussion in order to reach consensus about what to include and what to leave for future work (possible re-charter of the WG). I have used some quotations of people's mails. If someone thinks I have not understood his point, or I have simplified the problem, feel free to report it. - We are talking about 5 possible documents: - Document (A) refers to the main TCMTF draft, currently in http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-saldana-tsvwg-tcmtf/ - Document (B) refers to the informational draft about maximum tolerable delays, currently in http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-suznjevic-tsvwg-mtd-tcmtf/ - Document (C) may refer to a new document about signaling - Document (D) may refer to the proposal of Matteo and Tomasso (the "DLR" draft) - Document (E) may refer to a document about LISP and TCMTF So I am sending 5 different mails in order to know if there is consensus about: - The content of each Document - If the Document has to be: - included in the current charter - announced as future work after re-chartering - not cited at all Best regards, Jose
- [tcmtf] TCMTF: Summary of the discussion about th… Jose Saldana