Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
<Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de> Fri, 11 January 2013 17:48 UTC
Return-Path: <Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix)
with ESMTP id 8424721F8994 for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:48:46 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com
[127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2ktTQ6Ck80vE for
<tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:48:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mailhost.dlr.de (mailhost.dlr.de [129.247.252.32]) by
ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFE2921F88EA for <tcmtf@ietf.org>;
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 09:48:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: from DLREXHUB01.intra.dlr.de (172.21.152.130) by dlrexedge01.dlr.de
(172.21.163.100) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.2.318.4;
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:48:14 +0100
Received: from DLREXMBX02.intra.dlr.de ([fe80::8cc6:b83e:ddc1:4e8b]) by
dlrexhub01.intra.dlr.de ([::1]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004;
Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:48:20 +0100
From: <Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de>
To: <diego@tid.es>, <fpb@tid.es>
Thread-Topic: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
Thread-Index: Ac3uTNeTbO+aCk7ITXS7wkpgZ6Gw0gABangwADG+O4AANqC9gAALzvKg
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:48:20 +0000
Message-ID: <48DB40641BACF54C892EB0A12B4733C10BEDC84A@dlrexmbx02.intra.dlr.de>
References: <F5EDC35DF914C1428C28E149F10463A252895425@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet>
<E6D8B95470ED0845B3376F61DCAB1A046533FEC1@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
In-Reply-To: <E6D8B95470ED0845B3376F61DCAB1A046533FEC1@EX10-MB1-MAD.hi.inet>
Accept-Language: de-DE, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [129.247.173.107]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-2"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: tcmtf@ietf.org, Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr, Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de,
jsaldana@unizar.es
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion
list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>,
<mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 17:48:46 -0000
Hi all, Just a small clarification: the "DLR" idea is not just constrained to satellites, it applies to all wireless access mediums in general. Since on these wireless access mediums, header compression is desirable but it has to be terminated at the access point, the idea is to extend it to the backbone by exploiting a modification of TCMTF. Regards, Matteo -----Original Message----- From: Diego R. Lopez [mailto:diego@tid.es] Sent: 11 January 2013 17:06 To: FERNANDO PASCUAL BLANCO Cc: Mirko Sužnjevic; jsaldana@unizar.es; tcmtf@ietf.org; Cola, Tomaso de; Berioli, Matteo Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2 Hi, While I agree with Fernando when it comes to the formal procedure, I don't see any harm in the DLR guys progressing with the satellite scenario. As Mirko says, we can include in the charter the scenario once we have a mature draft... Be goode, On 10 Jan 2013, at 11:01 , FERNANDO PASCUAL BLANCO wrote: > Hi Mirko, Jose, > > I also think that satellite specific scenario can wait to be discussed, focusing our efforts in the complete definition of the TCMTF itself. Regarding the discussion about the signaling for capabilities negotiation, it is being discussed in a different thread. > > Regards, > > Fernando Pascual Blanco > Telefónica Global Resources > Network Automation and Dynamization > TECHNOLOGY PEOPLE GROUP > F +34913128779 > M +34682005168 > fpb@tid.es > > From: Mirko Sužnjević <Mirko.Suznjevic@fer.hr> > Date: miércoles, 9 de enero de 2013 11:21 > To: "jsaldana@unizar.es" <jsaldana@unizar.es>es>, "tcmtf@ietf.org" > <tcmtf@ietf.org> > Cc: "Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de" <Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de>de>, > "Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de" <Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de>de>, Fernando Pascual > Blanco <fpb@tid.es> > Subject: RE: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. > 2 > > Well the satelite scenario is very interesting application of TCMTF, but I think that at this point we should focus our efforts on the current documents. Once we have the draft of the satellite scenario written and discussed we can include it in the new version of the Charter. > I think that the same applies to your first question regarding the specific draft about signaling issues. I think that the WG can be re-chartered later on. > > Mirko Suznjevic > > From: tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf > Of Jose Saldana > Sent: Wednesday, January 9, 2013 10:49 AM > To: tcmtf@ietf.org > Cc: Tomaso.deCola@dlr.de; Matteo.Berioli@dlr.de; Fernando Pascual > Blanco > Subject: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart proposal. 2 > > There is another question: Tomaso, from DLR, proposed another draft for a specific satellite scenario (http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf/current/msg00095.html). Should we include this in the charter? > > My opinion is that, at this stage, we could begin the WG without considering this, and at the same time a draft could be written and discussed. According to the ideas and feedback after that, including it in a new version of the Charter could be considered. > > Jose > > > > Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. > This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: > http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx > _______________________________________________ > tcmtf mailing list > tcmtf@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf -- "Esta vez no fallaremos, Doctor Infierno" Dr Diego R. Lopez Telefonica I+D http://people.tid.es/diego.lopez/ e-mail: diego@tid.es Tel: +34 913 129 041 Mobile: +34 682 051 091 ----------------------------------------- ________________________________ Este mensaje se dirige exclusivamente a su destinatario. Puede consultar nuestra política de envío y recepción de correo electrónico en el enlace situado más abajo. This message is intended exclusively for its addressee. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at: http://www.tid.es/ES/PAGINAS/disclaimer.aspx
- [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Chart pr… Jose Saldana
- Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Char… Mirko Sužnjević
- Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Char… FERNANDO PASCUAL BLANCO
- Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Char… Diego R. Lopez
- Re: [tcmtf] Questions regarding the TCMTF WG Char… Matteo.Berioli