IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [tcmtf] Answers to possible questions in the BOF

"Jose Saldana" <jsaldana@unizar.es> Mon, 24 June 2013 11:31 UTC

Return-Path: <jsaldana@unizar.es>
X-Original-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 927ED21E80DC for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 04:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.515
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.515 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.083, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id o5mniopBY4IC for <tcmtf@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 04:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ortiz.unizar.es (ortiz.unizar.es [155.210.1.52]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2B49211E8129 for <tcmtf@ietf.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 04:31:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from usuarioPC (gtc1pc12.cps.unizar.es [155.210.158.17]) by ortiz.unizar.es (8.13.8/8.13.8/Debian-3) with ESMTP id r5OBV6Qq019940; Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:31:06 +0200
From: Jose Saldana <jsaldana@unizar.es>
To: jsaldana@unizar.es, tcmtf@ietf.org
References: <007e01ce70c9$fe1a0aa0$fa4e1fe0$@unizar.es>
In-Reply-To: <007e01ce70c9$fe1a0aa0$fa4e1fe0$@unizar.es>
Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 13:31:10 +0200
Organization: Universidad de Zaragoza
Message-ID: <00a401ce70ce$53435aa0$f9ca0fe0$@unizar.es>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_00A5_01CE70DF.16CC2AA0"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AQHxl5HfJe4XxEPJrqhURPk2/vEH5pj+arnQ
Content-Language: es
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd & Bogofilter
Subject: Re: [tcmtf] Answers to possible questions in the BOF
X-BeenThere: tcmtf@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
Reply-To: jsaldana@unizar.es
List-Id: "Tunneling Compressed Multiplexed Traffic Flows \(TCMTF\) discussion list" <tcmtf.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcmtf>
List-Post: <mailto:tcmtf@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcmtf>, <mailto:tcmtf-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2013 11:31:17 -0000

Question 2: Why creating a Working Group? Why not doing this inside the
tsvwg?

 

Answer:

 

This was our first idea, one year ago. But it has become clear that a
specific WG is required for this. 

 

This in it is something a separate WG should be created to handle, and not
something to try to do inside the TSVWG, since there are already a handful
of things TSVWG is wrestling with, and it creates too much "context
switching" to have a lot of unrelated topics under work there.

 

The question is that the TSVWG group has a lot of interesting things now,
and it would be better to discuss TCMTF separately.

 

 

Any comments?

 

Jose

 

De: tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:tcmtf-bounces@ietf.org] En nombre de Jose
Saldana
Enviado el: lunes, 24 de junio de 2013 13:00
Para: tcmtf@ietf.org
Asunto: [tcmtf] Answers to possible questions in the BOF

 

I would like to start a thread about possible questions people may ask in
the BOF. Obviously, we also need answers, so we should cooperate.

 

This is different from the "questions to ask in the BOF". This will be
discussed separately.

 

Thanks!

 

Jose

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email