Re: [Tcpcrypt] Initial questions

Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu> Tue, 24 June 2014 20:31 UTC

Return-Path: <touch@isi.edu>
X-Original-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 085051B2801 for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:31:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.551
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.551 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 66E6fnil6oRx for <tcpcrypt@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from darkstar.isi.edu (darkstar.isi.edu [128.9.128.127]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BB1401B2825 for <tcpcrypt@ietf.org>; Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:31:54 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [128.9.160.166] (abc.isi.edu [128.9.160.166]) (authenticated bits=0) by darkstar.isi.edu (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id s5OKVBFp020214 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT); Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:31:11 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53A9E00F.7020502@isi.edu>
Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 13:31:11 -0700
From: Joe Touch <touch@isi.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Sandy Harris <sandyinchina@gmail.com>, tcpcrypt@ietf.org
References: <CACXcFmmQCgTu6-QLJZdH8Q+ZST97ugoTaUWCUV0S6AWsjvCGfg@mail.gmail.com> <53A98F00.4000702@bbn.com> <CACXcFmkdK1VquTbi1bSxyfV9L1dDYvETMYoZV=nrumeJ7w6PoA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CACXcFmkdK1VquTbi1bSxyfV9L1dDYvETMYoZV=nrumeJ7w6PoA@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-ISI-4-43-8-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: touch@isi.edu
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/tcpcrypt/farcc22jZ4iw4ivoVBKSm0YNF-Q
Subject: Re: [Tcpcrypt] Initial questions
X-BeenThere: tcpcrypt@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discussion list for adding encryption to TCP." <tcpcrypt.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/tcpcrypt/>
List-Post: <mailto:tcpcrypt@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/tcpcrypt>, <mailto:tcpcrypt-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 20:31:56 -0000


On 6/24/2014 1:22 PM, Sandy Harris wrote:
...
> Anyway, this is an opportunistic encryption protocol which blocks
> easy wholesale monitoring.

Of content. Nothing in the charter ensures protection of the meta 
information (endpoints addrs or ports), nor is traffic confidentiality 
required.

Joe