Re: Simultaneous Open

Re: Simultaneous Open - Reg

Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU> Mon, 22 April 2002 17:53 UTC

From: Bob Braden <braden@ISI.EDU>
Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 17:53:06 GMT
Message-Id: <200204221753.RAA13275@gra.isi.edu>
To: tcp-impl@grc.nasa.gov, uday@qpackets.com
Subject: Re: Simultaneous Open - Reg
X-Sun-Charset: US-ASCII
Sender: owner-tcp-impl@grc.nasa.gov
Precedence: bulk
Status: RO
Content-Length: 940
Lines: 21

  *> From owner-tcp-impl@grc.nasa.gov  Sun Apr 21 22:07:54 2002
  *> From: "Udaya kumar" <uday@qpackets.com>
  *> To: <tcp-impl@grc.nasa.gov>
  *> Subject: Simultaneous Open - Reg
  *> Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2002 10:13:26 +0530
  *> MIME-Version: 1.0
  *> X-Priority: 3
  *> X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
  *> X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2919.6600
  *> X-AntiVirus: scanned by AMaViS 0.2.1
  *> 
  *> Hi
  *> 
  *>     I have a query regarding simultaneous open in TCP.
  *> 
  *>     The response to a SYN segment in the SYN_SENT state is to send a SYN,ACK carrying the old sequence number(i.e seq. no of the SYN segment sent earlier). Ref -> rfc793 &&  rfc1122. If the response is such,  then the SYN,ACK segment would be dropped at the receving side due to sequence number check. Hence connection cannot be established.

No.  It will be accepted and the "receiving" side will go from SYN_SENT
state to ESTABLISHED.

Bob Braden